Supporting Information: Male castration and female sterilization improve survival but do not explain sex-differences in vertebrate ageing
Michael Garratt, Christine Neyt, Michael Stout, José V. V. Isola, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Jean-François Lemaître, Malgorzata Lagisz, & Shinichi Nakagawa
Setting-ups
Loading packages
# packages ####
#ochaRd
#
# install.packages("devtools")
# install.packages("tidyverse")
# #install.packages("metafor")
# install.packages("patchwork")
# install.packages("R.rsp")
#
# devtools::install_github("daniel1noble/orchaRd", force = TRUE, build_vignettes = TRUE)
# remotes::install_github("rvlenth/emmeans", dependencies = TRUE, build_opts = "")
#
# #emmeans
# remotes::install_github("rvlenth/emmeans", dependencies = TRUE, build_opts = "")
# # metafor
# install.packages("remotes")
# remotes::install_github("wviechtb/metafor")
# loading
::p_load(tidyverse,
pacman
metafor,
pander,
stringr,
ape,
kableExtra,
patchwork,
lme4,
readxl,#emmeans,
rotl,
orchaRd,
clubSandwich,
MuMIn,
png,
grid,
here,
formatR,
naniar,
GoodmanKruskal,
ggalluvial
)
# you may need to run this (we will plan to fix this)
library(groundhog)
groundhog.library("emmeans", '2022-04-01')
# need for metafor to understand MuMin
eval(metafor:::.MuMIn)
Loading custom functions
# custom functions
# function for getting lnRR for proportional data (mortality)
<- function(m1, m2, n1, n2) {
lnrrp # arcsine transforamtion
<- function(p) {
asin_trans asin(sqrt(p))
}# SD for arcsine distribution (see Wiki -
# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcsine_distribution)
<- 1/8
var1 <- 1/8
var2 # lnRR - with 2nd order correction
<- log(asin_trans(m1)/asin_trans(m2)) + 0.5 * ((var1/(n1 * asin_trans(m1)^2)) -
lnrr /(n2 * asin_trans(m2)^2)))
(var2
<- var1/(n1 * asin_trans(m1)^2) + var1^2/(2 * n1^2 * asin_trans(m1)^4) +
var /(n2 * asin_trans(m2)^2) + var2^2/(2 * n2^2 * asin_trans(m2)^4)
var2
invisible(data.frame(yi = lnrr, vi = var))
}
# function to get to lnRR for longevity data (CV required) The method proposed
# in Nakagawa et al (2022) - missing SD method
<- function(m1, m2, n1, n2, cv21, cv22) {
lnrrm # lnRR - with 2nd order correction
<- log(m1/m2) + 0.5 * ((cv21/n1) - (cv22/n2))
lnrr
<- (cv21/n1) + ((cv21^2)/(2 * n1^2)) + (cv22/n2) + ((cv22^2)/(2 * n2^2))
var
invisible(data.frame(yi = lnrr, vi = var))
}
# for folded normal distribution see:
# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folded_normal_distribution
# folded mean
<- function(mean, variance) {
folded_mu <- mean
mu <- sqrt(variance)
sigma <- sigma * sqrt(2/pi) * exp((-mu^2)/(2 * sigma^2)) + mu * (1 - 2 * pnorm(-mu/sigma))
fold_mu
fold_mu
}
# folded variance
<- function(mean, variance) {
folded_v <- mean
mu <- sqrt(variance)
sigma <- sigma * sqrt(2/pi) * exp((-mu^2)/(2 * sigma^2)) + mu * (1 - 2 * pnorm(-mu/sigma))
fold_mu <- sqrt(mu^2 + sigma^2 - fold_mu^2)
fold_se # adding se to make bigger mean
<- fold_se^2
fold_v
fold_v }
Data preparation & processing
Main data
# dat_full <- read_csv(here('data', 'dat_07072021.csv'), na = c('', 'NA'))
# dat_full <- read_csv(here('data', 'data_15022022.csv'), na = c('', 'NA'))
<- read_csv(here("data", "data_05052022.csv"), na = c("", "NA"))
dat_full # glimpse(dat_full)
# loading data ####
%>%
dat_full filter(is.na(Treatment_lifespan_variable) == FALSE) %>%
filter(Type_of_sterilization != "Vasectomy") %>%
mutate_if(is.character, as.factor) -> dat
dim(dat)
## [1] 159 40
dim(dat_full)
## [1] 161 40
# separating two kinds
<- ifelse(str_detect(dat$Lifespan_parameter, "Me"), "longevity", "mortality")
effect_type
# fix a typo in species name
$Species_Latin <- gsub("Macaca Fascicularis", "Macaca fascicularis", dat$Species_Latin)
dat$Species_Latin <- gsub("Equus caballus", "Equus ferus", dat$Species_Latin)
dat
# creating the phylo column
$Phylogeny <- sub(" ", "_", dat$Species_Latin)
dat$Effect_type <- effect_type
dat$Effect_ID <- 1:nrow(dat)
dat# key variables
names(dat)
## [1] "Order_extracted" "Study"
## [3] "Controlled_treatments" "Type_of_sterilization"
## [5] "Gonads_removed" "Control_treatment"
## [7] "Shamtreatment_moderator" "Sex"
## [9] "Species_Latin" "Species"
## [11] "Strain" "Environment"
## [13] "Wild_or_semi_wild" "Age_at_treatment"
## [15] "Maturity_at_treatment" "Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal"
## [17] "Duration_of_treatment" "Shared_control"
## [19] "Control_lifespan_variable" "Treatment_lifespan_variable"
## [21] "Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable" "Error_control"
## [23] "Error_experimental" "Error_opposite_sex"
## [25] "Lifespan_parameter" "Lifespan_unit"
## [27] "Error_unit" "Error_control_SD"
## [29] "Error_experimental_SD" "Error_opposite_sex_SD"
## [31] "Coefficent_difference_to_control" "Lower_interval"
## [33] "Upper_interval" "Coefficent_unit"
## [35] "Sample_size_control" "Sample_size_sterilization"
## [37] "Sample_size_opposite_sex" "Notes"
## [39] "Notes2" "Notes3"
## [41] "Phylogeny" "Effect_type"
## [43] "Effect_ID"
unique(dat$Species_Latin)
## [1] "Equus ferus" "Rattus argentiventer" "Oryctolagus cuniculus"
## [4] "Myodes glareolus" "Mus musculus" "Rattus norvegicus"
## [7] "Anolis sagrei" "Felis catus" "Canis lupus"
## [10] "Mesocricetus auratus" "Homo sapiens" "Trichosurus vulpecula"
## [13] "Phascolarctos cinereus" "Ovis aries" "Odocoileus virginianus"
## [16] "Oncorhynchus masou" "Oncorhynchus nerka" "Vulpes vulpes"
## [19] "Macaca fascicularis" "Varecia rubra" "Varecia variegata"
## [22] "Lamperta fluviatilis"
kable(dat, "html") %>%
kable_styling("striped", position = "left") %>%
scroll_box(width = "100%", height = "250px")
Order_extracted | Study | Controlled_treatments | Type_of_sterilization | Gonads_removed | Control_treatment | Shamtreatment_moderator | Sex | Species_Latin | Species | Strain | Environment | Wild_or_semi_wild | Age_at_treatment | Maturity_at_treatment | Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal | Duration_of_treatment | Shared_control | Control_lifespan_variable | Treatment_lifespan_variable | Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable | Error_control | Error_experimental | Error_opposite_sex | Lifespan_parameter | Lifespan_unit | Error_unit | Error_control_SD | Error_experimental_SD | Error_opposite_sex_SD | Coefficent_difference_to_control | Lower_interval | Upper_interval | Coefficent_unit | Sample_size_control | Sample_size_sterilization | Sample_size_opposite_sex | Notes | Notes2 | Notes3 | Phylogeny | Effect_type | Effect_ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kirkpatrick and Turner 2004 | No | porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraception | No | untreated | No | Female | Equus ferus | Horses | NA | Wild | Yes | 2 Years | Adult | 4 | Less than 3 years | 1 | 6.4700 | 10.2700 | 10.300 | 0.850 | 0.5600 | 0.840 | Mean | years | S.E.M | 5.508630 | 1.857310 | 6.285984 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 11 | 56 | Sterilization requires booster injections and these did not receive, the longer treatment did | NA | NA | Equus_ferus | longevity | 1 |
2 | Kirkpatrick and Turner 2004 | No | porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraception | No | untreated | No | Female | Equus ferus | Horses | NA | Wild | Yes | 2 Years | Adult | 4 | More than 3 years | 1 | 6.4700 | 19.9400 | 10.300 | 0.850 | 1.6600 | 0.840 | Mean | years | S.E.M | 5.508630 | 7.235772 | 6.285984 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 19 | 56 | NA | NA | NA | Equus_ferus | longevity | 2 |
3 | Jacob et al 2004 A | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus argentiventer | Ricefield rats | NA | Outdoor enclosure | No | Unknown - wild caught (approx 100g) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 2 | 0.2800 | 0.6700 | NA | 6.000 | 34.0000 | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season | S.E.M | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 18 | 6 | NA | 25% population sterilized data from two enclosures pooled | The impact of sterilized females on enclosed populations of ricefield rats | Estimated age at treatment from data on weight at surgery. They were approximately 100g and are never referred to as sexually immature. 1Pregnancy occurs from when the animals are 60-120 g in weight (Sudarmaji 2002). | Rattus_argentiventer | mortality | 3 |
4 | Jacob et al 2004 A | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus argentiventer | Ricefield rats | NA | Outdoor enclosure | No | Unknown - wild caught (approx 100g) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 3 | 0.1400 | 0.2500 | NA | 6.000 | 8.0000 | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season | S.E.M | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 | 12 | NA | 50% population sterilzed data from two enclosures pooled | The impact of sterilized females on enclosed populations of ricefield rats | NA | Rattus_argentiventer | mortality | 4 |
5 | Jacob et al 2004 A | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus argentiventer | Ricefield rats | NA | Outdoor enclosure | No | Unknown - wild caught (approx 100g) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 4 | 0.2200 | 0.1700 | NA | 6.000 | 6.0000 | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season | S.E.M | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6 | 18 | NA | 75% population sterilized data from two enclosures pooled | The impact of sterilized females on enclosed populations of ricefield rats | NA | Rattus_argentiventer | mortality | 5 |
6 | Jacob et al 2004 B | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus argentiventer | Ricefield rats | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught (approx 100g) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 10 | 0.4100 | 0.4200 | NA | 0.110 | 0.1700 | NA | Survival rate (%) | two months | deviance | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 13 | 24 | NA | Radiocollared - Animals spread across 4 plots giving error for survival | NA | NA | Rattus_argentiventer | mortality | 6 |
7 | Jacob et al 2004 B | Yes | Progesterone treatment | No | Untreated | No | Female | Rattus argentiventer | Ricefield rats | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught (approx 100g) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 10 | 0.4100 | 0.4000 | NA | 0.110 | 0.0000 | NA | Survival rate (%) | two months | deviance | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 15 | 24 | NA | Radiocollared -Animals spread across 4 plots giving error for survival. Progesterone treatment wore off and some females got pregnant | NA | NA | Rattus_argentiventer | mortality | 7 |
8 | Twigg et al 2000 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery or no surgery | No | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbit | NA | Outdoor enclosure | Yes | Unknown - wild caught (see notes for age estimation) | Adult | 4 | NA | 5 | 0.1330 | 0.4180 | 0.165 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Four years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 225 | 165 | 435 | 1993 cohorts. Assuming adults at sterilization because they do not refer to kittens, and because they show the survival of sterile females against intact females and intact adult males. They also show a plot of kitten survival and show that it is very poor | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 8 |
9 | Twigg et al 2000 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery or no surgery | No | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbit | NA | Outdoor enclosure | Yes | Unknown - wild caught - yearling. Puberty or adult? | NA | NA | NA | 6 | 0.2390 | 0.3630 | 0.221 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Four years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 109 | 63 | 267 | 1994 cohorts | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 9 |
10 | Twigg et al 2000 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery or no surgery | No | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbit | NA | Outdoor enclosure | Yes | Unknown - wild caught - yearly. Puberty or adult? | NA | NA | NA | 7 | 0.2100 | 0.3140 | 0.209 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Four years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 252 | 155 | 382 | 1995 cohorts - Also survival data and data split into different densities | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 10 |
11 | Gipps and Jewel 1979 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Myodes glareolus | Bank vole | NA | Outdoor enclosure | No | Immature | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 8 | 0.7820 | 0.9570 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 6 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 23 | 23 | NA | No reproduction in enclosure so density both treatments exposed to would be the same | NA | NA | Myodes_glareolus | mortality | 11 |
12 | Gipps and Jewel 1979 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Myodes glareolus | Bank vole | NA | Outdoor enclosure | No | Immature | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 9 | 0.7590 | 1.0000 | 0.700 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 11 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 29 | 18 | 40 | Some intacts were in a control enclosure without castrates. In the enclosure with castrates the density in the enclosure increased slightly quicker | NA | NA | Myodes_glareolus | mortality | 12 |
13 | Zakeri et al 2019 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mouse | NMRI | Laboratory | No | 10 months | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 11 | 0.3600 | 0.5000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 11.5 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 16 | 16 | NA | Its the sterilization treatment that is compared to two different types of control in this study | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | mortality | 13 |
14 | Zakeri et al 2019 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Mus musculus | Mouse | NMRI | Laboratory | No | 10 months | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 11 | 0.3300 | 0.5000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 11.5 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 16 | 16 | NA | Its the sterilization treatment that is compared to two different types of control in this study | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | mortality | 14 |
15 | Dorner 1973 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Untreated | No | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Sprague-Dawley-Stammes | Laboratory | No | Day after birth | Birth | 1 | NA | 12 | 570.0000 | 696.0000 | NA | 122.000 | 132.0000 | NA | Mean | days | Standard Deviation | 122.000000 | 132.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 | 8 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 15 |
16 | Asdell et al 1967 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Cornell Nutrion colony | Laboratory | No | Between 38-42 days | Puberty | 3 | NA | 13 | 742.0000 | 669.0000 | 615.000 | 24.000 | 26.0000 | 21.000 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 169.705627 | 183.847763 | 148.492424 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | Also data for mated females but havent included as would be a different environment (e.g. With males) | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 16 |
17 | Asdell et al 1967 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Cornell Nutrion colony | Laboratory | No | Between 39-42 days | Puberty | 3 | NA | 14 | 615.0000 | 651.0000 | 742.000 | 21.000 | 26.0000 | 24.000 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 148.492424 | 183.847763 | 169.705627 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 17 |
18 | Asdell and Joshi 1976 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Manor-Wistar | Laboratory | No | 45 days old | Puberty | 3 | NA | 15 | 654.0000 | 844.0000 | 661.000 | 24.000 | 24.0000 | 30.000 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 169.705627 | 169.705627 | 212.132034 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 18 |
19 | Asdell and Joshi 1976 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Manor-Wistar | Laboratory | No | 45 days old | Puberty | 3 | NA | 16 | 661.0000 | 775.0000 | 654.000 | 30.000 | 30.0000 | 24.000 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 212.132034 | 212.132034 | 169.705627 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 19 |
20 | Arriola Apelo et al 2020 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | No | 21 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 17 | 1006.0000 | 978.0000 | 853.000 | 34.300 | 37.4500 | 26.250 | Median | days | S.E.M | 145.522576 | 183.466782 | 136.399001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 18 | 24 | 27 | NA | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 20 |
21 | Arriola Apelo et al 2020 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | No | 21 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 18 | 853.0000 | 916.0000 | 1006.000 | 26.250 | 49.3600 | 34.300 | Median | days | S.E.M | 136.399001 | 231.518922 | 145.522576 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 27 | 22 | 18 | NA | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 21 |
22 | Benedusi et al 2015 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL76 (ERE-LucRepTOP™) | Laboratory | No | 5 Months | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 19 | 0.1000 | 0.3500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 15 Months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 20 | 20 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | mortality | 22 |
24 | Cargil et al 2003 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | CBA | Laboratory | No | 21 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 21 | 599.2900 | 578.6400 | NA | 30.450 | 35.6000 | NA | Median | Days | S.E.M | 158.222841 | 178.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 27 | 25 | NA | Extracted median lifespan from data in figure and calculated SD | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 23 |
25 | Cox et al 2014 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught - assuming adult because caught at the same time of year as other studies, but work “adult” not specifically mentioned. | Adult | 4 | NA | 22 | 0.2600 | 0.3300 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 168 | 170 | NA | Raw data from Dyrad. My survival estimates from survival dont equal those extracted from the model, that probably includes covariates | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 24 |
26 | Cox et al 2014 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught | Adult | 4 | NA | 22 | 0.3000 | 0.2000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Winter (Sept-May) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 20 | 20 | NA | Remaining animals from first mortality assessment and only controls where fat was not removed. My survival estimates from those alive after monitored period | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 25 |
27 | Cox and Calsbeek 2010 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught | Adult | 4 | NA | 23 | 0.0800 | 0.2400 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 188 | 194 | NA | Data is also available for Summer and winter mortality, seperately | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 26 |
28 | Cox et al 2010 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Yes | Adult - wild caught | Adult | 4 | NA | 24 | 0.2300 | 0.3400 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 105 | 106 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 27 |
29 | Reedy et al 2016 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught adult after start of breeding | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 25 | 0.2500 | 0.2100 | 0.550 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 10 weeks (of breeding season) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 110 | 110 | 60 | NA | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 28 |
30 | Reedy et al 2016 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught adult after start of breeding | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 26 | 0.5500 | 0.2800 | 0.250 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 10 weeks (of breeding season) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 60 | 60 | 110 | NA | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 29 |
31 | Drori and Folman 1976 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Albino | Laboratory | No | 38-44 days. Stated as prepuberty | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 27 | 727.0000 | 817.0000 | 849.000 | 26.000 | 32.0000 | 26.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 182.000000 | 224.000000 | 182.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 49 | 49 | 49 | Authors state that they castrated animals shortly before puberty, so coded as prepuberty | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 30 |
32 | Garratt et al 2021 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | No | 7-8 weeks | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 28 | 952.0000 | 960.0000 | 956.000 | 20.700 | 36.4000 | 28.500 | Median | Days | S.E.M | 117.096883 | 218.400000 | 156.100929 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 32 | 36 | 30 | NA | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 31 |
33 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Outbred | Domestic | No | Under 5 months (before sexual maturity) | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 29 | 5.3000 | 12.2000 | 7.700 | 0.420 | 1.4800 | 0.520 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 4.136520 | 5.336216 | 4.794163 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 97 | 13 | 85 | Correlative data is provided in a figure showing exact age at gonadectomy and lifespan for each individual | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 32 |
34 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Outbred | Domestic | No | 6 to 7 months | Puberty | 3 | NA | 29 | 5.3000 | 8.6000 | 7.700 | 0.420 | 1.1200 | 0.520 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 4.136520 | 5.371331 | 4.794163 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 97 | 23 | 85 | NA | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 33 |
35 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Outbred | Domestic | No | over 8 months | Adult | 4 | NA | 29 | 5.3000 | 7.2000 | 7.700 | 0.420 | 0.7100 | 0.520 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 4.136520 | 4.376734 | 4.794163 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 97 | 38 | 85 | NA | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 34 |
36 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Felis catus | Cats | Outbred | Domestic | No | Various, median 6 months | NA | NA | NA | 30 | 7.7000 | 8.2000 | 5.300 | 0.520 | 0.5200 | 0.420 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 4.794163 | 4.503332 | 4.136520 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 85 | 75 | 97 | NA | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 35 |
37 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Felis catus | Cats | Name breeds | Domestic | No | Various, median 6 months | NA | NA | NA | 31 | 6.2000 | 8.2000 | 4.600 | 0.840 | 0.8100 | 0.700 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 5.040000 | 4.723071 | 3.500000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 34 | 25 | NA | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 36 |
38 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Name breeds | Domestic | No | Various, median 6 months | NA | NA | NA | 32 | 4.6000 | 6.9000 | 6.200 | 0.700 | 0.5900 | 0.840 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 3.500000 | 4.971428 | 5.040000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 25 | 71 | 36 | NA | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 37 |
39 | Waters et al 2011 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Rottweilers | Domestic | No | 6.1-8 years | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 33 | 0.2670 | 1.0000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Likelyhood of exceptional longevity | Survival to 13 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 14 | 14 | NA | Look at whether animals were normally lived, or lived over 13 years. Author is providing me with the raw data | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | mortality | 38 |
40 | Waters et al 2011 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Rottweilers | Domestic | No | 2.1-6 years | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 33 | 0.2670 | 0.4390 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Likelyhood of exceptional longevity | Survival to 13 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 14 | 57 | NA | Look at whether animals were normally lived, or lived over 13 years. Author is providing me with the raw data | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | mortality | 39 |
41 | Waters et al 2011 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Rottweilers | Domestic | No | 0.4-2 years. Estimated as puberty because rott weilers start to go through heat at approximately 12-18 months | Puberty | 3 | NA | 33 | 0.2670 | 0.3230 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Likelyhood of exceptional longevity | Survival to 13 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 14 | 65 | NA | Look at whether animals were normally lived, or lived over 13 years. Author is providing me with the raw data | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | mortality | 40 |
42 | Holland et al 1977 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | RFM | Laboratory | No | 3-4 weeks | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 34 | 638.0000 | 628.0000 | NA | 16.000 | 16.0000 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 167.044904 | 162.382265 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 109 | 103 | NA | Just used data from non-irradiated group. Lots of pathology data | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 41 |
43 | Kirkman and Yau 1972 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Mesocricetus auratus | Hamsters | Syrian Hamsters | Laboratory | No | Unknown - not given | NA | NA | NA | 35 | 632.0000 | 508.0000 | 543.000 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Days | NA | 222.910000 | 151.300000 | 222.950000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 629 | 72 | 578 | Do not have error presented in paper. The proportion of animals dying in 10 brackets of different ages is presented that could be used (Figs 3 and 4). Upper and low quartiles estimated from figure 3 when number of animals dying in 100 day periods is given. Have used the middle number within this period for the quartile value (e.g. 550-850 for intact males, 350-550 for castrated males) | NA | NA | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity | 42 |
44 | Kirkman and Yau 1972 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mesocricetus auratus | Hamsters | Syrian Hamsters | Laboratory | No | Unknown - not given | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 543.0000 | 391.0000 | 632.000 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Days | NA | 222.950000 | 155.440000 | 222.910000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 578 | 31 | 629 | Do not have error presented in paper. The proportion of animals dying in 10 brackets of different ages is presented that could be used (Figs 3 and 4). Upper and low quartiles estimated from figure 3 when number of animals dying in 100 day periods is given. Have used the middle number within this period for the quartile value (e.g. 450-750 for intact females, 250-450 for castrated females) | NA | NA | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity | 43 |
45 | Sichuk 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mesocricetus auratus | Hampsters | Syrian Hampsters | Laboratory | No | 6 weeks | Puberty | 3 | NA | 37 | 612.0000 | 578.0000 | 589.000 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Days | NA | 222.910000 | 151.300000 | 222.950000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 92 | 90 | 94 | Use - SD from Kirkman & Yau;Error not provided. Mean lifespan comes from the lifespan of both those with thrumobis and those that do not have it. Calculated the mean of these two values weighed against the sample size of each group | NA | NA | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity | 44 |
46 | Sichuk 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Mesocricetus auratus | Hampsters | Syrian Hampsters | Laboratory | No | 6 weeks | Puberty | 3 | NA | 38 | 589.0000 | 586.0000 | 612.000 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Days | NA | 222.950000 | 155.440000 | 222.910000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 94 | 92 | 92 | Use - SD from Kirkman & Yau;Error not provided. Mean lifespan comes from the lifespan of both those with thrumobis and those that do not have it. Calculated the mean of these two values weighed against the sample size of each group | NA | NA | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity | 45 |
47 | Mitchel et al 1999 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 39 | 131.0000 | 128.0000 | 130.000 | 1.400 | 2.7000 | 1.800 | Mean | Months | S.E.M | 50.029192 | 46.058550 | 51.951131 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1277 | 291 | 833 | Used all causes of death. Data collected on the basis of surveys that pet owners filled out about their last pets age at death | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 46 |
48 | Mitchel et al 1999 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 40 | 130.0000 | 144.0000 | 131.000 | 1.800 | 1.5000 | 1.400 | Mean | Months | S.E.M | 51.951131 | 40.249224 | 50.029192 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 833 | 720 | 1277 | Used all causes of death. Data collected on the basis of surveys that pet owners filled out about their last pets age at death | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 47 |
49 | Moore et al 2001 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Military working dogs | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 41 | 9.9700 | 10.4900 | NA | 2.100 | 2.0600 | NA | Median | Years | Standard deviation | 2.100000 | 2.060000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 641 | 143 | NA | Shinichi made decisoin to halve the rest of N to control and the opposit sex;Do not know the sample size of castrated males. 641/927 animals in the study are intact males, the remaining animals are either castrated males or spayed females but we do not know sample size of each of these two groups. | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 48 |
50 | Nieschlag et al 1993 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Castrate prepubertal boys to prevent maturation of voice | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 42 | 64.3000 | 65.5000 | NA | 14.100 | 13.8000 | NA | Mean | Years | Standard Deviation | 14.100000 | 13.800000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 200 | 50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 49 |
51 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Albino | Laboratory | No | 44 days. Testes had decended by the operation | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 43 | 788.0000 | 770.0000 | 863.000 | 22.250 | 28.0000 | 27.690 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 32.987398 | 41.512231 | 41.052632 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10 | 8 | 17 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 50 |
53 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Albino | Laboratory | No | 27.5 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 44 | 863.0000 | 755.0000 | 788.000 | 27.690 | 22.1500 | 22.250 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 41.052632 | 32.839140 | 32.987398 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 37 | 10 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 51 |
54 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Hysterectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Albino | Laboratory | No | 29 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 44 | 863.0000 | 855.0000 | 788.000 | 27.690 | 12.6700 | 22.250 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 41.052632 | 18.784285 | 32.987398 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 60 | 10 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 52 |
55 | Storer et al 1982 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | RFM | Laboratory | No | 50 days | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 45 | 643.4000 | 662.2000 | NA | 5.910 | 7.3100 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M. | 161.311607 | 134.193762 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 745 | 337 | NA | Non-irradiated controls from an irradiation experiment | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 53 |
56 | Storer et al 1982 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | Balb/c | Laboratory | No | 50 days | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 46 | 762.9000 | 795.5000 | NA | 6.210 | 10.9500 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M. | 179.016109 | 197.707397 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 831 | 326 | NA | Non-irradiated controls from an irradiation experiment | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 54 |
57 | Hoffman et al 2018 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 47 | 10.8600 | 11.6400 | 10.860 | 0.110 | 0.0700 | 0.140 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 3.327386 | 2.033618 | 3.685485 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 915 | 844 | 693 | Vetcompass database | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 55 |
58 | Hoffman et al 2018 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 48 | 10.8600 | 12.1200 | 10.860 | 0.140 | 0.1900 | 0.110 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 3.685485 | 5.766116 | 3.327386 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 693 | 921 | 915 | Vetcompass database | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 56 |
59 | Hoffman et al 2018 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 49 | 8.0000 | 9.2100 | 7.680 | 0.070 | 0.0400 | 0.070 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 8.556337 | 4.241509 | 6.018372 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 14941 | 11244 | 7392 | VMDB - individual data for breeds available in supplementary, but just mean lifespan without error | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 57 |
60 | Hoffman et al 2018 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 7.6800 | 9.7300 | 8.000 | 0.070 | 0.0400 | 0.070 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 6.018372 | 5.599714 | 8.556337 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 7392 | 19598 | 14941 | VMDB - individual data for breeds available in supplementary, but just mean lifespan without error | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 58 |
61 | Mason et al 2009 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | CBA | Laboratory | No | 21 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 51 | 727.6000 | 715.0000 | NA | 15.900 | 20.0000 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 89.943983 | 101.980390 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 32 | 26 | NA | Worked out sample size from fig 4 This and the other entry for this paper have two different control comparisons | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 59 |
62 | Mason et al 2009 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | CBA | Laboratory | No | 21 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 51 | 725.6000 | 715.0000 | NA | 20.400 | 20.0000 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 117.189078 | 101.980390 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 33 | 26 | NA | Worked out sample size from fig 4 | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 60 |
63 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | Birth | Birth | 1 | NA | 52 | 454.0000 | 521.0000 | 484.000 | 18.000 | 27.0000 | 19.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 108.000000 | 174.979999 | 123.134073 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 42 | 42 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 61 |
64 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 22-28 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 52 | 454.0000 | 488.0000 | 484.000 | 18.000 | 28.0000 | 19.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 108.000000 | 165.650234 | 123.134073 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 35 | 42 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 62 |
65 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 100 days | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 52 | 454.0000 | 439.0000 | 484.000 | 18.000 | 25.0000 | 19.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 108.000000 | 119.895788 | 123.134073 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 23 | 42 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 63 |
66 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | Birth | Birth | 1 | NA | 53 | 484.0000 | 574.0000 | 454.000 | 19.000 | 33.0000 | 18.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 123.134073 | 183.736224 | 108.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 31 | 36 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 64 |
67 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 22-28 days | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 53 | 484.0000 | 480.0000 | 454.000 | 19.000 | 44.0000 | 18.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 123.134073 | 206.378293 | 108.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 22 | 36 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 65 |
68 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 100 days | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 53 | 484.0000 | 515.0000 | 454.000 | 19.000 | 41.0000 | 18.000 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 123.134073 | 183.357574 | 108.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 20 | 36 | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity | 66 |
69 | Tapprest et al 2017 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Equus ferus | Draught horse | NA | Farm | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 54 | 0.1520 | 0.1740 | 0.103 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 10 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 132 | 23 | 638 | No error provided with median lifespan but there is proportion surviving to a specific age, which includes condfidence intervals, and survival curves. Have used survival to 10 yeays of age. | NA | NA | Equus_ferus | mortality | 67 |
70 | Tapprest et al 2017 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Equus ferus | Pony | NA | Farm | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 55 | 0.6970 | 0.6970 | 0.709 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 10 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 211 | 201 | 533 | No error provided with median lifespan but there is proportion surviving to a specific age, which includes condfidence intervals, and survival curves. Have used survival to 10 yeays of age. | NA | NA | Equus_ferus | mortality | 68 |
71 | Tapprest et al 2017 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Equus ferus | Saddle horse | NA | Farm | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 56 | 0.5620 | 0.5540 | 0.575 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 10 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1077 | 2203 | 4124 | No error provided with median lifespan but there is proportion surviving to a specific age, which includes condfidence intervals, and survival curves. Have used survival to 10 yeays of age. | NA | NA | Equus_ferus | mortality | 69 |
72 | Hamilton 1965 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | 6 -12 months for those that were known | Puberty or adult | NA | NA | 57 | 3.2000 | 6.8000 | 7.700 | 0.340 | 0.5800 | 0.680 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 2.741168 | 4.492661 | 5.178726 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 65 | 60 | 58 | Error displayed must be standard error not standard deviation. I initially interpreted the symbol used as standard deviation but actually it must be SEM, and this is what Hamilton usually uses. Otherwise they are abnormally low. | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 70 |
73 | Hamilton 1965 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | 6 -12 months for those that were known | Puberty or adult | NA | NA | 58 | 7.7000 | 9.2000 | 3.200 | 0.680 | 0.8800 | 0.340 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 5.178726 | 4.656522 | 2.741168 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 58 | 28 | 65 | Error displayed must be standard error not standard deviation. I initially interpreted the symbol used as standard deviation but actually it must be SEM, and this is what Hamilton usually uses. Otherwise they are abnormally low. | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 71 |
74 | Hamilton 1965 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | 6 -12 months for those that were known | Puberty or adult | NA | NA | 59 | 6.1000 | 8.5000 | 7.400 | 0.660 | 0.5600 | 0.720 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 4.713343 | 4.913980 | 5.091169 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 51 | 77 | 50 | Error displayed must be standard error not standard deviation. I initially interpreted the symbol used as standard deviation but actually it must be SEM, and this is what Hamilton usually uses. Otherwise they are abnormally low. | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 72 |
75 | Hamilton 1965 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | 6 -12 months for those that were known | Puberty or adult | NA | NA | 60 | 7.4000 | 8.4000 | 6.100 | 0.720 | 0.7100 | 0.660 | Mean | Years | S.E.M | 5.091169 | 4.762825 | 4.713343 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 45 | 51 | Error displayed must be standard error not standard deviation. I initially interpreted the symbol used as standard deviation but actually it must be SEM, and this is what Hamilton usually uses. Otherwise they are abnormally low. | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 73 |
76 | Huang et al 2017 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 61 | 9.0000 | 12.0000 | 10.000 | NA | NA | NA | Median | Years | Interquartile range | 5.941000 | 3.723000 | 5.947000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 839 | 332 | 528 | Interquartile range Intact, 5.0-13.0; castrated 9.0-14.0 | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 74 |
77 | Huang et al 2017 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 62 | 10.0000 | 12.0000 | 9.000 | NA | NA | NA | Median | Years | Interquartile range | 5.947000 | 3.938000 | 5.941000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 528 | 607 | 839 | Interquartile range Intact, 5.0-13.0; ovariectomy 9.7-15.0 | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 75 |
78 | Min et al 2012 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various.The boys lost their reproductive organs in accidents, or they underwent deliberate castration to gain access to the palace before becoming a teenager. | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 63 | 55.6000 | 70.0000 | NA | 0.530 | 1.7600 | NA | Median | Years | S.E.M | 17.784639 | 15.840000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1126 | 81 | NA | Mok family | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 76 |
79 | Min et al 2012 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various.The boys lost their reproductive organs in accidents, or they underwent deliberate castration to gain access to the palace before becoming a teenager. | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 63 | 52.9000 | 70.0000 | NA | 0.450 | 1.7600 | NA | Median | Years | S.E.M | 16.921436 | 15.840000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1414 | 81 | NA | Shin family | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 77 |
80 | Min et al 2012 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various.The boys lost their reproductive organs in accidents, or they underwent deliberate castration to gain access to the palace before becoming a teenager. | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 63 | 50.9000 | 70.0000 | NA | 2.160 | 1.7600 | NA | Median | Years | S.E.M | 15.120000 | 15.840000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 49 | 81 | NA | Seo family | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 78 |
81 | Williams et al 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbits | European Rabbit | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught (>500g weight) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 65 | 0.2710 | 0.4970 | 0.269 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 70 | 143 | 331 | 1993 cohort_treatment shared between two controls | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 79 |
82 | Williams et al 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbits | European Rabbit | Wild | Yes | Unknown - wild caught (>500g weight) | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 65 | 0.2710 | 0.4970 | 0.269 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 140 | 143 | 331 | 1994 cohort_treatment shared between two controls | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 80 |
83 | Williams et al 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbits | European Rabbit | Wild | Yes | Yearling (>500g) Puberty or adult? | NA | NA | NA | 66 | 0.5120 | 0.5160 | 0.271 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 41 | 128 | 280 | 1994 cohort_Treatment shared | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 81 |
84 | Williams et al 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbits | European Rabbit | Wild | Yes | Yearling (>500g) Puberty or adult? | NA | NA | NA | 66 | 0.3770 | 0.5160 | 0.271 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 77 | 128 | 280 | 1994 cohort_Treatment shared | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 82 |
85 | Williams et al 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbits | European Rabbit | Wild | Yes | Yearling (>500g) Puberty or adult? | NA | NA | NA | 67 | 0.2790 | 0.5180 | 0.347 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 43 | 114 | 236 | 1995 cohort_Treatment shared | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 83 |
86 | Williams et al 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Oryctolagus cuniculus | Rabbits | European Rabbit | Wild | Yes | Yearling (>500g) Puberty or adult? | NA | NA | NA | 67 | 0.3380 | 0.5180 | 0.347 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 68 | 114 | 236 | 1995 cohort_Treatment shared | NA | NA | Oryctolagus_cuniculus | mortality | 84 |
87 | Urfer et al 2019 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 68 | 14.0900 | 14.1500 | 13.770 | 0.033 | 0.0130 | 0.046 | Median | years | 95% Confidence intervals | 18.753700 | 12.400487 | 22.107487 | NA | 0.033 | 0.0130 | 0.046 | 322958 | 909894 | 230974 | 95% confidence intervals Intact Male: 14.03-14.16; Castrated male: 14.13-14.18 | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 85 |
88 | Urfer et al 2019 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 69 | 13.7700 | 14.3500 | 14.090 | 0.046 | 0.0102 | 0.033 | Median | years | 95% Confidence intervals | 22.107487 | 9.710121 | 18.753700 | NA | 0.046 | 0.0102 | 0.033 | 230974 | 906252 | 322958 | 95% confidence intervals Intact female: 13.68-13.86, OVX female: 14.33-14.37 | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 86 |
89 | Ramsey 2005 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Trichosurus vulpecula | Possum | NA | Wild | Yes | Various | Adult | 4 | NA | 70 | 0.7800 | 0.8700 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual (taken from 4 years) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 56 | 56 | NA | Orongorono 50% sterility_Survival from Fig 7, sample sizes from number of animals released over the years 1996-1999 | NA | NA | Trichosurus_vulpecula | mortality | 87 |
90 | Ramsey 2005 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Trichosurus vulpecula | Possum | NA | Wild | Yes | Various | Adult | 4 | NA | 71 | 0.7200 | 0.8300 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual (taken from 4 years) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 142 | NA | Orongorono 80% sterility_Survival from Fig 7, sample sizes from number of animals released over the years 1996-1999 | NA | NA | Trichosurus_vulpecula | mortality | 88 |
91 | Ramsey 2005 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Trichosurus vulpecula | Possum | NA | Wild | Yes | Various | Adult | 4 | NA | 72 | 0.6300 | 0.7600 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual (taken from 4 years) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 215 | 215 | NA | Turitea 50% sterility_Survival from Fig 7, sample sizes from number of animals released over the years 1996-1999. Confidence intervals are provided | NA | NA | Trichosurus_vulpecula | mortality | 89 |
92 | Ramsey 2005 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Trichosurus vulpecula | Possum | NA | Wild | Yes | Various | Adult | 4 | NA | 73 | 0.6000 | 0.7400 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual (taken from 4 years) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 31 | 123 | NA | Turitea 80% sterility_Survival from Fig 7, sample sizes from number of animals released over the years 1996-1999 | NA | NA | Trichosurus_vulpecula | mortality | 90 |
93 | Ramsey et al 2021 | Yes | levonorgestrel implant | No | Sham capture | Yes | Female | Phascolarctos cinereus | Koala | NA | Wild | Yes | Mature females, as definted by toothwear, under 1 year | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 74 | 0.7200 | 0.7800 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual (average from across all years) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 603 | 4355 | NA | Survival rate taken as the average across all years. Sample size is also from across all years. Yearly data is also available in supplementary. Confidence intervals are provided. | NA | NA | Phascolarctos_cinereus | mortality | 91 |
94 | Muhlock 1959 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Mus musculus | Mouse | DBA | Laboratory | No | Weaning (1month) | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 75 | 578.0000 | 595.0000 | 667.000 | 10.120 | 11.4400 | 9.570 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 78.389183 | 102.322471 | 88.748529 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 60 | 80 | 86 | Extracted data and calculated mean and SE from graph | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 92 |
95 | Muhlock 1959 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mouse | DBA | Laboratory | No | Weaning (1 month) | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 76 | 667.0000 | 627.0000 | 578.000 | 9.570 | 10.6700 | 10.120 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 88.748529 | 87.987074 | 78.389183 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 86 | 68 | 60 | Extracted data and calculated mean and SE from graph | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 93 |
96 | Jewel 1997 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Ovis aries | Sheep | Soay sheep | Wild | Yes | Lambs | Birth | 1 | NA | 77 | 0.3600 | 0.7100 | 0.410 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | one year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 14 | 14 | 54 | 1978 Calaculated the survival rate to the timepoint nearest 50% intact male survival | NA | NA | Ovis_aries | mortality | 94 |
97 | Jewel 1997 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Ovis aries | Sheep | Soay sheep | Wild | Yes | Lambs | Birth | 1 | NA | 78 | 0.2000 | 0.8800 | 0.910 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One year | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 8 | 5 | 44 | 1979 | NA | NA | Ovis_aries | mortality | 95 |
98 | Jewel 1997 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Ovis aries | Sheep | Soay sheep | Wild | Yes | Lambs | Birth | 1 | NA | 79 | 0.0800 | 0.6600 | 0.400 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Five years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 83 |
|
NA | NA | Ovis_aries | mortality | 96 |
99 | Iwasa et al 2018 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley | Laboratory | No | 23 weeks | Late adult | 4 | NA | 80 | 0.4300 | 0.8600 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | ~85 weeks. | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 8 | 7 | NA | Calculated from a partial survival curve. Looked at when 50% of the control group died and then the number alive in the treatment group at this point | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | mortality | 97 |
100 | Hamilton and Mestler 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | Mentally handicaped individuals | NA | No | 8-14 years (prepubertal) | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 81 | 64.7000 | 76.3000 | NA | 0.990 | 1.3600 | NA | Median lifespan (for those alive at 40) | Years | S.E.M | 17.709658 | 5.769991 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 320 | 18 | NA | Median lifespan data from Table 10. This data is taken from those individuals alive at 40. Data for those alive at earlier ages is also available but not stratified into different surgery ages | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 98 |
101 | Hamilton and Mestler 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | Mentally handicaped individuals | NA | No | 15-19 years | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 81 | 64.7000 | 72.9000 | NA | 0.990 | 5.1300 | NA | Median lifespan (for those alive at 40) | Years | S.E.M | 17.709658 | 43.529493 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 320 | 72 | NA | Median lifespan data from Table 10. This data is taken from those individuals alive at 40. Data for those alive at earlier ages is also available but not stratified into different surgery ages | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 99 |
102 | Hamilton and Mestler 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | Mentally handicaped individuals | NA | No | 20-29 years | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 81 | 64.7000 | 69.6000 | NA | 0.990 | 2.5000 | NA | Median lifespan (for those alive at 40) | Years | S.E.M | 17.709658 | 19.525624 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 320 | 61 | NA | Median lifespan data from Table 10. This data is taken from those individuals alive at 40. Data for those alive at earlier ages is also available but not stratified into different surgery ages | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 100 |
103 | Hamilton and Mestler 1969 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Homo sapiens | Humans | Mentally handicaped individuals | NA | No | 30-39 years | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 81 | 64.7000 | 68.9000 | NA | 0.990 | 2.0500 | NA | Median lifespan (for those alive at 40) | Years | S.E.M | 17.709658 | 14.350000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 320 | 49 | NA | Median lifespan data from Table 10. This data is taken from those individuals alive at 40. Data for those alive at earlier ages is also available but not stratified into different surgery ages | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 101 |
104 | Hamilton and Mestler 1969 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | Mentally handicaped individuals | NA | No | 13-46 years old | Adult | 4 | NA | 82 | 33.9000 | 56.2000 | NA | 1.360 | 4.6900 | NA | Median | Years | S.E.M | 15.265962 | 15.554970 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 126 | 11 | NA | Only one female was 13 years and all the rest were clearly adult so group coded as adult | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | longevity | 102 |
105 | Oneil et al 2013 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 83 | 11.9900 | 11.9900 | 11.590 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Years | Estimated | NA | NA | NA | 0.8 | 0.500 | 1.1000 | Average difference in years to control | 1464 | 1224 | 1082 | Means calculated from the coefficient change in lifespan in Table 4. Sample size for all was known, SD was estimated | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 103 |
106 | Oneil et al 2013 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 84 | 11.5900 | 12.3900 | 11.990 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Years | Estimated | NA | NA | NA | Look at comments for Coefficent whiich is in relation to the control female from the same study) | NA | NA | NA | 1082 | 1304 | 1464 | Means calculated from the coefficient change in lifespan in Table 4. Sample size for all was known, SD was estimated | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 104 |
107 | Oneil et al 2015 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 85 | 12.8100 | 14.7100 | 14.610 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Years | Estimated | NA | NA | NA | 0.6 | 0.100 | 1.0000 | Average difference in years to control | 704 | 1296 | 707 | Means calculated from the coefficient change in lifespan in Table 4. Sample size for each sex was estimated on the basis of the total sample size and the percentage that were known to be sterilized in both sexes, SD was estimated | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 105 |
108 | Oneil et al 2015 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 86 | 14.6100 | 15.2100 | 12.810 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Years | Estimated | NA | NA | NA | Look at comments for Coefficent whiich is in relation to the control female from the same study) | NA | NA | NA | 707 | 1302 | 704 | Means calculated from the coefficient change in lifespan in Table 4. Sample size for each sex was estimated on the basis of the total sample size and the percentage that were known to be sterilized in both sexes, SD was estimated | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 106 |
112 | Wilson et al 2019 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Under 50 years old | Adult | 4 | NA | 90 | 0.9351 | 0.9166 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 21.5 years (median follow-up) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10218 | 851 | NA | Calculated survival rate from those surviving across the study period. Hazard ratios are also provided in the paper, and additional analysis cotrolling for factors. There is also analysis where women are seperated according to whether they have used hormone replacement therapy. Additional studies are cited that have conducted this type of analysis. | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 107 |
113 | Wilson et al 2019 | No | Hysterectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Under 50 years old | Adult | 4 | NA | 90 | 0.9351 | 0.9324 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 21.5 years (median follow-up) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10218 | 2472 | NA | Calculated survival rate from those surviving across the study period. Hazard ratios are also provided in the paper, and additional analysis cotrolling for factors. There is also analysis where women are seperated according to whether they have used hormone replacement therapy. Additional studies are cited that have conducted this type of analysis. | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 108 |
114 | Cheng 2019 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mus musculus | Mice | UMHet3 | Laboratory | No | Under 30 days is stated. The figure shows weights starting at approximately 15-20 days so this is used in the correlation analysis | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 91 | 0.8100 | 0.9700 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 500 days | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 238 | 238 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | mortality | 109 |
115 | Bronson 1981 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | After 6 months (they state few were done before neutered before 6 months or so) | Puberty or adult | NA | NA | 92 | 4.9700 | 7.3400 | 6.650 | 3.660 | 4.2900 | 5.660 | Mean | Years - for cats surviving to two years old | Standard deviation | 3.660000 | 4.290000 | 5.660000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 219 | 265 | 99 | Lifespan of individuals calculated from histograms. Used data from animals that survived after the first year. | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 110 |
116 | Bronson 1981 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | No | After 6 months (they state few were done before neutered before 6 months or so) | Puberty or adult | NA | NA | 93 | 6.6500 | 9.1100 | 4.970 | 5.660 | 5.1300 | 3.660 | Mean | Years - for cats surviving to two years old | Standard deviation | 5.660000 | 5.130000 | 3.660000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 99 | 220 | 219 | Lifespan of individuals calculated from histograms. Used data from animals that survived after the first year. | NA | NA | Felis_catus | longevity | 111 |
117 | Bronson 1982 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 94 | 8.0000 | 9.9000 | 7.700 | 5.200 | 6.8000 | 4.400 | Mean (from those alive after 2) | Years | Standard Deviation | 5.200000 | 6.800000 | 4.400000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 755 | 54 | 224 | Mean lifespan is that of those that are alive from 2 years of age. The authors also provide lifespan from birth, but point out that animals are not usually sterilized until at least 6 months, so this doesnt provide a fair comparison | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 112 |
118 | Bronson 1982 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 95 | 7.7000 | 8.8000 | 8.000 | 4.400 | 6.9000 | 5.200 | Mean (from those alive after 2) | Years | Standard Deviation | 4.400000 | 6.900000 | 5.200000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 224 | 528 | 755 | Mean lifespan is that of those that are alive from 2 years of age. The authors also provide lifespan from birth, but point out that animals are not usually sterilized until at least 6 months, so this doesnt provide a fair comparison | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 113 |
119 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site FP predation natural | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 96 | 0.3590 | 0.5250 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 78 | 80 | NA | Site FP predation natural | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 114 |
120 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site FC no predation | No | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 97 | 0.5430 | 0.3590 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 81 | 78 | NA | Site FC no predation. Included as not wild-semi wild because protected from predation | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 115 |
121 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site HC Bird predation | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 98 | 0.3210 | 0.3920 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 81 | 79 | NA | Site HC Bird predation | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 116 |
122 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site FP Natural | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 99 | 0.3270 | 0.5610 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 110 | 114 | NA | Site FP Natural | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 117 |
123 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site NC No predation | No | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 100 | 0.2930 | 0.3470 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 75 | 75 | NA | Site NC No predation. Included as not wild semi-wild because protected from predation | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 118 |
124 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site FC Bird predation | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 101 | 0.4930 | 0.5730 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 75 | 75 | NA | Site FC Bird predation | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 119 |
125 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site HC Bird and snake predation | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 102 | 0.3330 | 0.2840 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 74 | 75 | NA | Site HC Bird and snake predation | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 120 |
126 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site Mc Bird and snake predation | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 103 | 0.2670 | 0.2530 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 75 | 75 | NA | Site Mc Bird and snake predation | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 121 |
127 | Cox et al 2021 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Site FP natural | Yes | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 104 | 0.2290 | 0.3400 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | One breeding season (May-Sept) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 105 | 106 | NA | Site FP natural | NA | NA | Anolis_sagrei | mortality | 122 |
128 | Skinner 2007 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Anesthetized but no surgery | Yes | Female | Odocoileus virginianus | White-tailed deer | NA | Suburban chicago | No | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 105 | 0.7500 | 0.5200 | 0.660 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | four years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 34 | 67 | 79 | It is stated that more treatment does died from vechicle accidents (e.g. Human biased) | NA | NA | Odocoileus_virginianus | mortality | 123 |
129 | Kent et al 2018 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | Golden retriver | Domestic | No | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 106 | 8.6800 | 9.3500 | 5.890 | NA | NA | NA | Median | Years | Range | 3.230000 | 2.710000 | 3.270000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 118 | 228 | 58 | Standard deviation calculated from the range according to Wan et al 2014 | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 124 |
130 | Kent et al 2018 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Canis lupus | Dogs | Golden retriver | Domestic | No | Unknown | NA | NA | NA | 107 | 5.8900 | 9.5100 | 8.680 | NA | NA | NA | Median | Years | Range | 3.270000 | 2.740000 | 3.230000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 58 | 248 | 118 | Standard deviation calculated from the range according to Wan et al 2014 | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 125 |
131 | Iversen et al 2007 | No | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 108 | 0.9195 | 0.9124 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 1968-2004 approx | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2634 | 2511 | NA | Groups differ in some demographic factors ie parity. Used data from Table 3 (all cause dealth), where women who had a history of cancer or cardiovascular disease etc, before their operation or follow-up period, were excluded from the analysis (see statistics section). | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 126 |
132 | Sato et al 1997 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley | Laboratory | No | 9 months | Adult | 4 | NA | 109 | 0.8000 | 0.9710 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 6 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 35 | 35 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | mortality | 127 |
133 | Aida et al 1984 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Oncorhynchus masou | masu salmon | NA | Laboratory | No | precocious | NA | NA | NA | 110 | 0.3360 | 0.6200 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 8 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 107 | 316 | NA | Experiments were conducted on precocious mature males. Need to work out how to classify this in terms of maturity at castration. Some males had partial gonads remaining at | NA | NA | Oncorhynchus_masou | mortality | 128 |
135 | Pullinger and Head 1964 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Untreated | No | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | C3Hf | Laboratory | No | 56-111 days of age | Adult | 4 | NA | 112 | 0.3700 | 0.2300 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 30 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 114 | 40 | NA | “average lifespan” in months is also provided but no error. Calculated the percentage surviving to 30 months as dead ranges are provided in 6 brackets and this is the closest to the median for control females. This group is control virgin females (OVX data was shared and compared to breeding females in the other female comparison for this paper but I removed it because I dont think social environment was comparable) | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | mortality | 129 |
136 | Robertson et al 1961 | No | Castration | Yes | Untreated | No | Male | Oncorhynchus nerka | Kokanee salmon | NA | Experimental pond | No | 2 years 1 month | Prior to sexual maturity | 2 | NA | 113 | 4.0500 | 5.3100 | 4.260 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | NA | NA | 0.590000 | 1.600000 | 0.550000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 41 | 13 | 58 | Only used data on animals that were found dead and did not have regenerating gonads. Mortality data is presented for a larger cohort that were also exposed to predation but control data is not seperated according to sex. | NA | NA | Oncorhynchus_nerka | longevity | 130 |
137 | Robertson et al 1961 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Untreated | No | Female | Oncorhynchus nerka | Kokanee salmon | NA | Experimental pond | No | 2 years 1 month | Prior to sexual maturity | 2 | NA | 114 | 4.2600 | 5.8900 | 4.050 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | NA | NA | 0.550000 | 1.630000 | 0.590000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 58 | 16 | 41 | Only used data on animals that were found dead and did not have regenerating gonads. Mortality data is presented for a larger cohort that were also exposed to predation but control data is not seperated according to sex. | NA | NA | Oncorhynchus_nerka | longevity | 131 |
138 | Saunders et al 2002 | Yes | Tubul-ligation | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Vulpes vulpes | Foxes | NA | Wild | Yes | Adult (toothwear) | NA | 4 | NA | 115 | 0.8300 | 0.8500 | 0.885 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 2 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6 | 20 | 26 | Included as controled because comparison is to animals on the same site. Male data is also from the same site | NA | NA | Vulpes_vulpes | mortality | 132 |
139 | Saunders et al 2002 | No | Tubul-ligation | No | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Vulpes vulpes | Foxes | NA | Wild | Yes | Adult (toothwear) | NA | 4 | NA | 115 | 0.7860 | 0.8500 | 0.955 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 2 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 14 | 20 | 22 | Included as not controlled as effect of sham surgery was assessed on a neighouring site although the authors compare survivalship rates between | NA | NA | Vulpes_vulpes | mortality | 133 |
140 | Collins and Kasbohn 2017 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | untreated | No | Female | Equus ferus | Feral horse | NA | Wild | Yes | Adult | NA | 4 | NA | 116 | 0.8610 | 0.8510 | 0.900 | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 114 | 36 | 10 | There is also male data but they used a lot of different methods, mainly vasectomy and chemical castration, and data is not split according to surgery type | NA | NA | Equus_ferus | mortality | 134 |
141 | Urfer et al 2020 | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | NA | Various | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 117 | 15.0000 | 15.2000 | 14.100 | NA | NA | NA | Median survival time | Years | Confidence interval (calcualted SD) | 17.598000 | 16.530000 | 20.090000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2115 | 8567 | 1551 | Calculated SD looks high? Another MSL from age 5 years is provided by not sure of the sample size included | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 135 |
142 | Urfer et al 2020 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Canis lupus | Dogs | NA | Various | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 118 | 14.1000 | 15.8000 | 15.000 | NA | NA | NA | Median survival time | Years | Confidence interval (calcualted SD) | 20.090000 | 16.670000 | 17.598000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1551 | 8711 | 2115 | Calculated SD looks high? Another MSL from age 5 years is provided by not sure of the sample size included | NA | NA | Canis_lupus | longevity | 136 |
143 | Ossewaarde et al 2005 | No | Hysterectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 119 | 0.7825 | 0.8197 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Mean 17 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10087 | 743 | NA | Taken from number of cases of mortality across the follow-up period (Table 3) | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 137 |
144 | Ossewaarde et al 2005 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various | NA | NA | NA | 119 | 0.7825 | 0.8139 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Mean 17 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10087 | 865 | NA | Taken from number of cases of mortality across the follow-up period (Table 3) | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 138 |
145 | Hotchkiss 1995 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley | Laboratory | No | 90 days | Adult | 4 | NA | 120 | 0.3330 | 0.8330 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 630 days | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 | 12 | NA | Survival to 630 days. Animals that presented with subquaneous tumors had these surgically removed. | NA | NA | Rattus_norvegicus | mortality | 139 |
146 | Rocca et al 2006 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Under 45 years old | Adult | 4 | NA | 121 | 0.8380 | 0.7340 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Not sure, but total follow up years is provided in tables | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1417 | 124 | NA | Data from Table 1 and includes all individuals in that bracket | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 140 |
147 | Rocca et al 2006 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | NA | Adult | 4 | NA | 122 | 0.6280 | 0.6910 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Not sure, but total follow up years is provided in tables | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 645 | 243 | NA | Data from Table 1 and includes all individuals in that bracket | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 141 |
148 | Rocca et al 2006 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | NA | Adult | 4 | NA | 123 | 0.5050 | 0.5530 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Not sure, but total follow up years is provided in tables | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 321 | 170 | NA | Data from Table 1 and includes all individuals in that bracket | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 142 |
149 | Howard et al 2005 | No | Hysterectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | NA | Adult | 4 | NA | 124 | 0.9790 | 0.9770 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 52976 | 18687 | NA | Total sample size split between groups is shown in “age at screening”, which equates to the total sample size given at start of results. Calculated mortality by adding all causes together. Not sure have calculated this correctly or why it differs so dramatically from % annual that is given | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 143 |
150 | Howard et al 2005 | No | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | NA | Adult | 4 | NA | 124 | 0.9790 | 0.9760 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 52976 | 18251 | NA | Total sample size split between groups is shown in “age at screening”, which equates to the total sample size given at start of results. Calculated mortality by adding all causes together. Not sure have calculated this correctly or why it differs so dramatically from % annual that is given | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 144 |
151 | Phelan 1995 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Female | Mus musculus | Mice | Swiss | Laboratory | No | Weaning | Weaning | 2 | NA | 125 | 0.4100 | 0.6200 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | To 800 days | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 30 | 30 | NA | Animals were maintained on a 90% of adlibitum diet. This was a control group for a sepeate CR study and they state stopped the animals getting fat. | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | mortality | 145 |
152 | Manson et al 2013 | No | Hysterectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Homo sapiens | Humans | NA | NA | No | Various | Adult | 4 | NA | 126 | 0.9706 | 0.9449 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 17 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 8102 | 5429 | NA | The control and hysterectomy data is taken from the placebo of two parrellel studies run by the WHI. Women in both studies were matched for age and various variables, although some differences between the cohorts were present as would be typical. | NA | NA | Homo_sapiens | mortality | 146 |
153 | Deleuze et al 2021 | No | Tubectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Macaca fascicularis | Long-tailed Macaques | NA | NA | Yes | Adult (most) and a few subadult | NA | 4 | NA | 127 | 0.8600 | 0.8700 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 3 years | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22 | 39 | NA | 2017-2018 cohort. Authors sent me additional data for control female animals that had been marked, and were tracked over the same time period from the same population. | NA | NA | Macaca_fascicularis | mortality | 147 |
154 | Deleuze et al 2021 | No | Tubectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Macaca fascicularis | Long-tailed Macaques | NA | NA | Yes | Adult (most) and a few subadult | NA | 4 | NA | 128 | 0.9300 | 0.9500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 41 | 43 | NA | 2018-2019 cohort. Authors sent me additional data for control female animals that had been marked, and were tracked over the same time period from the same population. | NA | NA | Macaca_fascicularis | mortality | 148 |
155 | Deleuze et al 2021 | No | Tubectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Macaca fascicularis | Long-tailed Macaques | NA | NA | Yes | Adult (most) and a few subadult | NA | 4 | NA | 129 | 0.9500 | 0.9800 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | Annual | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 134 | 45 | NA | 2019-2020 cohort. Authors sent me additional data for control female animals that had been marked, and were tracked over the same time period from the same population. | NA | NA | Macaca_fascicularis | mortality | 149 |
156 | Wang et al 2021 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | NA | No | 8 months | Adult | 4 | NA | 130 | 933.5000 | 938.5000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Median | NA | SD | 129.000000 | 117.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22 | 22 | NA | Extended figure 3I | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 150 |
157 | Wang et al 2021 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Yes | Male | Mus musculus | Mice | NA | NA | No | 18 months | Adult | 4 | NA | 131 | 974.0000 | 959.0000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Median | NA | SD | 95.000000 | 93.000000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 19 | 19 | NA | Fig 6q Animals had been injected with a control shRNA | NA | NA | Mus_musculus | longevity | 151 |
158 | Tidiere 2016 | No | Various | NA | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Varecia rubra | Red ruffed lemur | NA | Zoo | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 132 | 15.6500 | 19.8400 | 16.180 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | NA | SD | 12.454792 | 10.210810 | 13.436925 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 689 | 67 | 927 | Data as described in Fig 7.3 of thesis, from 1 year of age and split for each species | NA | NA | Varecia_rubra | longevity | 152 |
159 | Tidiere 2016 | No | Various | NA | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Varecia rubra | Red ruffed lemur | NA | Zoo | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 133 | 16.1800 | 19.4000 | 15.650 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | NA | SD | 13.436925 | 11.495374 | 12.454792 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 927 | 38 | 689 | Data as described in Fig 7.3 of thesis, from 1 year of age and split for each species | NA | NA | Varecia_rubra | longevity | 153 |
160 | Tidiere 2016 | No | Various | NA | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Varecia variegata | Black and white ruffed lemur | NA | Zoo | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 134 | 13.9500 | 18.0300 | 13.820 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | NA | SD | 13.122827 | 12.489796 | 14.485185 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1542 | 36 | 1999 | Data as described in Fig 7.3 of thesis, from 1 year of age and split for each species | NA | NA | Varecia_variegata | longevity | 154 |
161 | Tidiere 2016 | No | Various | NA | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Varecia variegata | Black and white ruffed lemur | NA | Zoo | No | Unknown | Unknown | NA | NA | 134 | 13.8200 | 15.8600 | 13.950 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | NA | SD | 14.485185 | 12.320698 | 13.122827 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1999 | 37 | 1542 | Data as described in Fig 7.3 of thesis, from 1 year of age and split for each species | NA | NA | Varecia_variegata | longevity | 155 |
162 | Larsen1969 | Yes | Gonadectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Lamperta fluviatilis | River Lamprey | NA | Lab but wild caught | No | Prior to sexual maturity - Jan | NA | 2 | NA | 135 | 0.1000 | 0.3000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | May (after spawning) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10 | 10 | 10 | Data extracted from Figures 6D in Larsen 1973 (thesis) and the published abstract. Have calculated survival rate compared to when there is only one control animal alive so we can calculate a log-response ratio. Data is given as the number of gonadectomized animals that survived past the die-off. From figures 3 and 4 of the thesis there is no gonadectomized animal that dies over April when the last of the control males and females died, so we can be confident that the proportion of alive and dead of control and gonadectomized is correct. | NA | NA | Lamperta_fluviatilis | mortality | 156 |
163 | Larsen1969 | Yes | Gonadectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Lamperta fluviatilis | River Lamprey | NA | Lab but wild caught | No | Prior to sexual maturity - Jan | NA | 2 | NA | 136 | 0.1000 | 0.2700 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | May (after spawning) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10 | 11 | 10 | Data extracted from Figures 6D in Larsen 1973 (thesis) and the published abstract. Have calculated survival rate compared to when there is only one control animal alive so we can calculate a log-response ratio. Data is given as the number of gonadectomized animals that survived past the die-off. From figures 3 and 4 of the thesis there is no gonadectomized animal that dies over April when the last of the control males and females died, so we can be confident that the proportion of alive and dead of control and gonadectomized is correct | NA | NA | Lamperta_fluviatilis | mortality | 157 |
164 | Larsen 1973 | Yes | Gonadectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Female | Lamperta fluviatilis | River Lamprey | NA | Lab but wild caught | No | Prior to sexual maturity - Either Jan or October prior year | NA | 2 | NA | 137 | 0.0600 | 0.2500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | May (after spawning) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 20 | 50 | Data extracted from Figures 6E in Lrsden 1973 (thesis). Sample sizes at the start are in Table 11. Have calculated survival rate compared to when there is only one control animal alive so we can calculate a log-response ratio. Data is given as the number of gonadectomized animals that survived past the die-off. From figures 3 and 4 of the thesis there is no gonadectomized animal that dies over April when the last of the control males and females died, so we can be confident that the proportion of alive and dead of control and gonadectomized is correct | NA | NA | Lamperta_fluviatilis | mortality | 158 |
165 | Larsen 1973 | Yes | Gonadectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | No | Male | Lamperta fluviatilis | River Lamprey | NA | Lab but wild caught | No | Prior to sexual maturity - Either Jan or October prior year | NA | 2 | NA | 138 | 0.0200 | 0.2500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | May (after spawning) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 20 | 17 | Data extracted from Figures 6E in Lrsden 1973 (thesis). Sample sizes at the start are in Table 12, pooled for the two treatment times. Sample size for the controls comes from fig 4 where heart weight is given just for the same year cohort and sample.sizes are shown. It is started that they have studied approximately 200 animals over the 4 years and never seen a control live much past spawning but this gives a definitive value for that year. Have calculated survival rate compared to when there is only one control animal alive so we can calculate a log-response ratio. Data is given as the number of gonadectomized animals that survived past the die-off. From figures 3 and 4 of the thesis there is no gonadectomized animal that dies over April when the last of the control males and females died, so we can be confident that the proportion of alive and dead of control and gonadectomized is correct | NA | NA | Lamperta_fluviatilis | mortality | 159 |
Calculating effect size for the main data
# let's get CVs
%>%
dat group_by(Study) %>%
summarise(cv2_cont = mean((Error_control_SD/Control_lifespan_variable)^2, na.rm = T),
cv2_trt = mean((Error_experimental_SD/Treatment_lifespan_variable)^2, na.rm = T),
cv2_opst = mean((Error_opposite_sex_SD/Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable)^2,
na.rm = T), n_cont = mean(Sample_size_control, na.rm = T), n_trt = mean(Sample_size_sterilization,
na.rm = T), n_opst = mean(Sample_size_opposite_sex, na.rm = T)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
summarise(cv2_cont = weighted.mean(cv2_cont, n_cont, na.rm = T), cv2_trt = weighted.mean(cv2_trt,
na.rm = T), cv2_opst = weighted.mean(cv2_opst, n_opst, na.rm = T)) ->
n_trt,
cvs
# lnRR using CV
$yi <- ifelse(effect_type == "longevity", lnrrm(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
dat$Control_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_control,
dat"cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_cont"]])[[1]], lnrrp(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Control_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_control)[[1]])
dat
$vi <- ifelse(effect_type == "longevity", lnrrm(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
dat$Control_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_control,
dat"cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_cont"]])[[2]], lnrrp(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Control_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_control)[[2]])
dat
# getting effect size for the long format we create a longer data format
<- dat
dat1 <- dat
dat2
$yi <- ifelse(effect_type == "longevity", lnrrm(dat$Control_lifespan_variable,
dat1$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_control, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex,
dat"cv2_cont"]], cvs[["cv2_opst"]])[[1]], lnrrp(dat$Control_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_control, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex)[[1]])
dat
$vi <- ifelse(effect_type == "longevity", lnrrm(dat$Control_lifespan_variable,
dat1$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_control, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex,
dat"cv2_cont"]], cvs[["cv2_opst"]])[[2]], lnrrp(dat$Control_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_control, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex)[[2]])
dat
# here we create CM/F or CF/M
$yi <- ifelse(effect_type == "longevity", lnrrm(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
dat2$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex,
dat"cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_opst"]])[[1]], lnrrp(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex)[[1]])
dat
$vi <- ifelse(effect_type == "longevity", lnrrm(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
dat2$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex,
dat"cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_opst"]])[[2]], lnrrp(dat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable, dat$Sample_size_sterilization, dat$Sample_size_opposite_sex)[[2]])
dat
# putting two data frames
<- rbind(dat1, dat2)
dat_long
# putt 2 new column
$Obs <- factor(1:dim(dat_long)[[1]])
dat_long$Comp_type <- as.factor(rep(c("both_normal", "one_castrated"), each = dim(dat_long)[[1]]/2))
dat_long
$Comp_type_Sex <- paste(dat_long$Comp_type, dat_long$Sex, sep = "_")
dat_long
$yi <- ifelse(dat_long$Comp_type_Sex == "one_castrated_Female" | dat_long$Comp_type_Sex ==
dat_long"both_normal_Female", -1 * dat_long$yi, dat_long$yi)
%>%
dat_long filter(!is.na(yi), !is.na(vi)) -> dat_long
dim(dat_long)
## [1] 170 48
Rodent data
This data is a subset of the main data only including data from rodents. This is used to test the effect of sterilization/castration on life stage (for these species, we were able to get more fine scale data). This dataset has two more variables: 1) Age_at_treatment (age in days when treatment was applied) and 2) Day_to_maturity (age in days when animals become mature). As also mentioned below, the analyses associated with this data set is post-hoc (not planned before data collection).
# sdat <- read_csv(here('data', 'data2_15022022.csv'), na = c('', 'NA'))
<- read_csv(here("data", "data3_05052022.csv"), na = c("", "NA"))
rdat
<- rdat %>%
rdat filter(is.na(Treatment_lifespan_variable) == FALSE) %>%
# filter(Type_of_sterilization != 'Vasectomy') %>%
mutate_if(is.character, as.factor)
dim(rdat)
## [1] 40 39
# separating two kinds
<- ifelse(str_detect(rdat$Lifespan_parameter, "Me"), "longevity", "mortality")
effect_type_r
# effect-level ID dat$Species_Latin <- gsub('Macaca Fascicularis', 'Macaca
# fascicularis', dat$Species_Latin) #fix a typo in species name
$Effect_ID <- 1:nrow(rdat)
rdat$Phylogeny <- sub(" ", "_", rdat$Species_Latin)
rdat$Effect_type <- effect_type_r
rdat
# key variables
names(rdat)
## [1] "Order_extracted" "Study"
## [3] "Controlled_treatments" "Type_of_sterilization"
## [5] "Gonads_removed" "Control_treatment"
## [7] "Sex" "Day_to_matuarity"
## [9] "Species_Latin" "Species"
## [11] "Strain" "Environment"
## [13] "Wild_or_semi_wild" "Age_at_treatment"
## [15] "Age_at_treatment_continuous" "Maturity_at_treatment"
## [17] "Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal" "Duration_of_treatment"
## [19] "Shared_control" "Control_lifespan_variable"
## [21] "Treatment_lifespan_variable" "Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable"
## [23] "Error_control" "Error_experimental"
## [25] "Error_opposite_sex" "Lifespan_parameter"
## [27] "Lifespan_unit" "Error_unit"
## [29] "Error_control_SD" "Error_experimental_SD"
## [31] "Error_opposite_sex_SD" "Coefficent_difference_to_control"
## [33] "Lower_interval" "Upper_interval"
## [35] "Coefficent_unit" "Sample_size_control"
## [37] "Sample_size_sterilization" "Sample_size_opposite_sex"
## [39] "Notes" "Effect_ID"
## [41] "Phylogeny" "Effect_type"
unique(rdat$Species_Latin)
## [1] Mus musculus Rattus norvegicus Mesocricetus auratus
## Levels: Mesocricetus auratus Mus musculus Rattus norvegicus
kable(rdat, "html") %>%
kable_styling("striped", position = "left") %>%
scroll_box(width = "100%", height = "250px")
Order_extracted | Study | Controlled_treatments | Type_of_sterilization | Gonads_removed | Control_treatment | Sex | Day_to_matuarity | Species_Latin | Species | Strain | Environment | Wild_or_semi_wild | Age_at_treatment | Age_at_treatment_continuous | Maturity_at_treatment | Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal | Duration_of_treatment | Shared_control | Control_lifespan_variable | Treatment_lifespan_variable | Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable | Error_control | Error_experimental | Error_opposite_sex | Lifespan_parameter | Lifespan_unit | Error_unit | Error_control_SD | Error_experimental_SD | Error_opposite_sex_SD | Coefficent_difference_to_control | Lower_interval | Upper_interval | Coefficent_unit | Sample_size_control | Sample_size_sterilization | Sample_size_opposite_sex | Notes | Effect_ID | Phylogeny | Effect_type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 | Zakeri et al 2019 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | NMRI | Laboratory | No | 10 months | 304.0 | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 11 | 0.360 | 0.500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 11.5 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 16 | 16 | NA | Its the sterilization treatment that is compared to two different types of control in this study | 1 | Mus_musculus | mortality |
14 | Zakeri et al 2019 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | NMRI | Laboratory | No | 10 months | 304.0 | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 11 | 0.330 | 0.500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 11.5 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 16 | 16 | NA | Its the sterilization treatment that is compared to two different types of control in this study | 2 | Mus_musculus | mortality |
15 | Dorner 1973 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Untreated | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley-Stammes | Laboratory | No | Day after birth | 2.0 | Birth | 1 | NA | 12 | 570.000 | 696.000 | NA | 122.00 | 132.00 | NA | Mean | days | Standard Deviation | 122.00000 | 132.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 | 8 | NA | NA | 3 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
16 | Asdell et al 1967 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Cornell Nutrion colony | Laboratory | No | Between 38-42 days | 40.0 | Puberty | 3 | NA | 13 | 742.000 | 669.000 | 615 | 24.00 | 26.00 | 21.00 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 169.70563 | 183.84776 | 148.49242 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | Also data for mated females but havent included as would be a different environment (e.g. With males) | 4 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
17 | Asdell et al 1967 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Cornell Nutrion colony | Laboratory | No | Between 39-42 days | 41.0 | Puberty | 3 | NA | 14 | 615.000 | 651.000 | 742 | 21.00 | 26.00 | 24.00 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 148.49242 | 183.84776 | 169.70563 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | NA | 5 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
18 | Asdell and Joshi 1976 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Manor-Wistar | Laboratory | No | 45 days old | 45.0 | Puberty | 3 | NA | 15 | 654.000 | 844.000 | 661 | 24.00 | 24.00 | 30.00 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 169.70563 | 169.70563 | 212.13203 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | NA | 6 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
19 | Asdell and Joshi 1976 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Manor-Wistar | Laboratory | No | 45 days old | 45.0 | Puberty | 3 | NA | 16 | 661.000 | 775.000 | 654 | 30.00 | 30.00 | 24.00 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 212.13203 | 212.13203 | 169.70563 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50 | 50 | 50 | NA | 7 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
20 | Arriola Apelo et al 2020 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | No | 21 days | 21.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 17 | 1006.000 | 978.000 | 853 | 34.30 | 37.45 | 26.25 | Median | days | S.E.M | 145.52258 | 183.46678 | 136.39900 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 18 | 24 | 27 | NA | 8 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
21 | Arriola Apelo et al 2020 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | No | 21 days | 21.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 18 | 853.000 | 916.000 | 1006 | 26.25 | 49.36 | 34.30 | Median | days | S.E.M | 136.39900 | 231.51892 | 145.52258 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 27 | 22 | 18 | NA | 9 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
22 | Benedusi et al 2015 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL76 (ERE-LucRepTOP™) | Laboratory | No | 5 Months | 152.0 | Adult (old) | 4 | NA | 19 | 0.100 | 0.350 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 15 Months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 20 | 20 | NA | NA | 10 | Mus_musculus | mortality |
24 | Cargil et al 2003 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | CBA | Laboratory | No | 21 days | 21.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 21 | 599.290 | 578.640 | NA | 30.45 | 35.60 | NA | Median | Days | S.E.M | 158.22284 | 178.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 27 | 25 | NA | Extracted median lifespan from data in figure and calculated SD | 11 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
31 | Drori and Folman 1976 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Male | 42 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Albino | Laboratory | No | 38-44 days. Stated as prepuberty | 41.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 27 | 727.000 | 817.000 | 849 | 26.00 | 32.00 | 26.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 182.00000 | 224.00000 | 182.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 49 | 49 | 49 | Authors state that they castrated animals shortly before puberty, so coded as prepuberty | 12 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
32 | Garratt et al 2021 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 70 | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | No | 7-8 weeks | 53.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 28 | 952.000 | 960.000 | 956 | 20.70 | 36.40 | 28.50 | Median | Days | S.E.M | 117.09688 | 218.40000 | 156.10093 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 32 | 36 | 30 | NA | 13 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
42 | Holland et al 1977 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | RFM | Laboratory | No | 3-4 weeks | 25.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 34 | 638.000 | 628.000 | NA | 16.00 | 16.00 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 167.04490 | 162.38226 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 109 | 103 | NA | Just used data from non-irradiated group. Lots of pathology data | 14 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
45 | Sichuk 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 48 | Mesocricetus auratus | Hampsters | Syrian Hampsters | Laboratory | No | 6 weeks | 42.0 | Puberty | 3 | NA | 37 | 612.000 | 578.000 | 589 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Days | NA | 222.91000 | 151.30000 | 222.95000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 92 | 90 | 94 | Use - SD from Kirkman & Yau;Error not provided. Mean lifespan comes from the lifespan of both those with thrumobis and those that do not have it. Calculated the mean of these two values weighed against the sample size of each group | 15 | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity |
46 | Sichuk 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 48 | Mesocricetus auratus | Hampsters | Syrian Hampsters | Laboratory | No | 6 weeks | 42.0 | Puberty | 3 | NA | 38 | 589.000 | 586.000 | 612 | NA | NA | NA | Mean | Days | NA | 222.95000 | 155.44000 | 222.91000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 94 | 92 | 92 | Use - SD from Kirkman & Yau;Error not provided. Mean lifespan comes from the lifespan of both those with thrumobis and those that do not have it. Calculated the mean of these two values weighed against the sample size of each group | 16 | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity |
51 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Albino | Laboratory | No | 44 days. Testes had decended by the operation | 44.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 43 | 788.000 | 770.000 | 863 | 22.25 | 28.00 | 27.69 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 32.98740 | 41.51223 | 41.05263 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10 | 8 | 17 | NA | 17 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
52 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Vasectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Albino | Laboratory | No | 46.5 days. Testes had decended by the operation | 47.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 43 | 788.000 | 685.000 | 863 | 22.25 | 39.72 | 27.69 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 32.98740 | 58.88807 | 41.05263 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10 | 12 | 17 | Standard deviation calculated from probable error as P.E./0.6745. Calculation derived from P.E. Wikipedia page | 18 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
53 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Albino | Laboratory | No | 27.5 days | 28.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 44 | 863.000 | 755.000 | 788 | 27.69 | 22.15 | 22.25 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 41.05263 | 32.83914 | 32.98740 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 37 | 10 | NA | 19 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
54 | Slonaker 1930 | Yes | Hysterectomy | No | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Albino | Laboratory | No | 29 days | 29.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 44 | 863.000 | 855.000 | 788 | 27.69 | 12.67 | 22.25 | Mean | Days | Probable error | 41.05263 | 18.78428 | 32.98740 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17 | 60 | 10 | NA | 20 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
55 | Storer et al 1982 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | RFM | Laboratory | No | 50 days | 50.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 45 | 643.400 | 662.200 | NA | 5.91 | 7.31 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M. | 161.31161 | 134.19376 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 745 | 337 | NA | Non-irradiated controls from an irradiation experiment | 21 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
56 | Storer et al 1982 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | Balb/c | Laboratory | No | 50 days | 50.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 46 | 762.900 | 795.500 | NA | 6.21 | 10.95 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M. | 179.01611 | 197.70740 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 831 | 326 | NA | Non-irradiated controls from an irradiation experiment | 22 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
61 | Mason et al 2009 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | CBA | Laboratory | No | 21 days | 21.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 51 | 727.600 | 715.000 | NA | 15.90 | 20.00 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 89.94398 | 101.98039 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 32 | 26 | NA | Worked out sample size from fig 4 This and the other entry for this paper have two different control comparisons | 23 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
62 | Mason et al 2009 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | CBA | Laboratory | No | 21 days | 21.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 51 | 725.600 | 715.000 | NA | 20.40 | 20.00 | NA | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 117.18908 | 101.98039 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 33 | 26 | NA | Worked out sample size from fig 4 | 24 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
63 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | Birth | 1.0 | Birth | 1 | NA | 52 | 454.000 | 521.000 | 484 | 18.00 | 27.00 | 19.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 108.00000 | 174.98000 | 123.13407 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 42 | 42 | NA | 25 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
64 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 22-28 days | 25.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 52 | 454.000 | 488.000 | 484 | 18.00 | 28.00 | 19.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 108.00000 | 165.65023 | 123.13407 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 35 | 42 | NA | 26 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
65 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 70 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 100 days | 100.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 52 | 454.000 | 439.000 | 484 | 18.00 | 25.00 | 19.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 108.00000 | 119.89579 | 123.13407 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 36 | 23 | 42 | NA | 27 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
66 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | Birth | 1.0 | Birth | 1 | NA | 53 | 484.000 | 574.000 | 454 | 19.00 | 33.00 | 18.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 123.13407 | 183.73622 | 108.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 31 | 36 | NA | 28 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
67 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 22-28 days | 25.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 53 | 484.000 | 480.000 | 454 | 19.00 | 44.00 | 18.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 123.13407 | 206.37829 | 108.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 22 | 36 | NA | 29 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
68 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | No | 100 days | 100.0 | Adult (young) | 4 | NA | 53 | 484.000 | 515.000 | 454 | 19.00 | 41.00 | 18.00 | Mean | Days | S.E.M | 123.13407 | 183.35757 | 108.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 42 | 20 | 36 | NA | 30 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
94 | Muhlock 1959 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Male | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | DBA | Laboratory | No | Weaning (1month) | 30.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 75 | 578.000 | 595.000 | 667 | 10.12 | 11.44 | 9.57 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 78.38918 | 102.32247 | 88.74853 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 60 | 80 | 86 | Extracted data and calculated mean and SE from graph | 31 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
95 | Muhlock 1959 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | DBA | Laboratory | No | Weaning (1 month) | 30.0 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 76 | 667.000 | 627.000 | 578 | 9.57 | 10.67 | 10.12 | Mean | days | S.E.M | 88.74853 | 87.98707 | 78.38918 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 86 | 68 | 60 | Extracted data and calculated mean and SE from graph | 32 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
99 | Iwasa et al 2018 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley | Laboratory | No | 23 weeks | 161.0 | Late adult | 4 | NA | 80 | 0.430 | 0.860 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | ~85 weeks. | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 8 | 7 | NA | Calculated from a partial survival curve. Looked at when 50% of the control group died and then the number alive in the treatment group at this point | 33 | Rattus_norvegicus | mortality |
114 | Cheng 2019 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | UMHet3 | Laboratory | No | Under 30 days | 17.5 | Prepuberty | 2 | NA | 91 | 0.810 | 0.970 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 500 days | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 238 | 238 | NA | NA | 34 | Mus_musculus | mortality |
132 | Sato et al 1997 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley | Laboratory | No | 9 months | 274.0 | Adult | 4 | NA | 109 | 0.800 | 0.971 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | 6 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 35 | 35 | NA | NA | 35 | Rattus_norvegicus | mortality |
135 | Pullinger and Head 1964 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | untreated | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | C3Hf | Laboratory | No | 56-111 days of age | 84.0 | Adult | 4 | NA | 112 | 0.370 | 0.230 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 30 months | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 114 | 40 | NA | “average lifespan” in months is also provided but no error. Calculated the percentage surviving to 30 months as dead ranges are provided in 6 brackets and this is the closest to the median for control females. This group is control virgin females (OVX data was shared and compared to breeding females in the other female comparison for this paper but I removed it because I dont think social environment was comparable) | 36 | Mus_musculus | mortality |
145 | Hotchkiss 1995 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 90 | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Sprague-Dawley | Laboratory | No | 90 days | 90.0 | Adult | 4 | NA | 120 | 0.333 | 0.833 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | to 630 days | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 | 12 | NA | Survival to 630 days. Animals that presented with subquaneous tumors had these surgically removed. | 37 | Rattus_norvegicus | mortality |
151 | Phelan 1995 | Yes | Ovariectomy | Yes | Sham surgery | Female | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | Swiss | Laboratory | No | Weaning | 25.0 | Weaning | 2 | NA | 125 | 0.410 | 0.620 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Survival rate (%) | To 800 days | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 30 | 30 | NA | Animals were maintained on a 90% of adlibitum diet. This was a control group for a sepeate CR study and they state stopped the animals getting fat. | 38 | Mus_musculus | mortality |
156 | Wang et al 2021 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | NA | No | 8 months | 243.0 | Adult | 4 | NA | 130 | 933.500 | 938.500 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Median | NA | SD | 129.00000 | 117.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22 | 22 | NA | Extended figure 3I | 39 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
157 | Wang et al 2021 | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Male | 42 | Mus musculus | Mice | NA | NA | No | 18 months | 548.0 | Adult | 4 | NA | 131 | 974.000 | 959.000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | Median | NA | SD | 95.00000 | 93.00000 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 19 | 19 | NA | Fig 6q Animals had been injected with a control shRNA | 40 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
Calculating effect size for the rodent data
# let's get CVs
%>%
rdat group_by(Study) %>%
summarise(cv2_cont = mean((Error_control_SD/Control_lifespan_variable)^2, na.rm = T),
cv2_trt = mean((Error_experimental_SD/Treatment_lifespan_variable)^2, na.rm = T),
cv2_opst = mean((Error_opposite_sex_SD/Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable)^2,
na.rm = T), n_cont = mean(Sample_size_control, na.rm = T), n_trt = mean(Sample_size_sterilization,
na.rm = T), n_opst = mean(Sample_size_opposite_sex, na.rm = T)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
summarise(cv2_cont = weighted.mean(cv2_cont, n_cont, na.rm = T), cv2_trt = weighted.mean(cv2_trt,
na.rm = T), cv2_opst = weighted.mean(cv2_opst, n_opst, na.rm = T)) ->
n_trt,
cvs
# lnRR using CV
$yi <- ifelse(effect_type_r == "longevity", lnrrm(rdat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
rdat$Control_lifespan_variable, rdat$Sample_size_sterilization, rdat$Sample_size_control,
rdat"cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_cont"]])[[1]], lnrrp(rdat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Control_lifespan_variable, rdat$Sample_size_sterilization, rdat$Sample_size_control)[[1]])
rdat
$vi <- ifelse(effect_type_r == "longevity", lnrrm(rdat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
rdat$Control_lifespan_variable, rdat$Sample_size_sterilization, rdat$Sample_size_control,
rdat"cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_cont"]])[[2]], lnrrp(rdat$Treatment_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Control_lifespan_variable, rdat$Sample_size_sterilization, rdat$Sample_size_control)[[2]])
rdat
str(rdat)
## tibble [40 × 44] (S3: tbl_df/tbl/data.frame)
## $ Order_extracted : num [1:40] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ...
## $ Study : Factor w/ 23 levels "Arriola Apelo et al 2020",..: 23 23 7 3 3 2 2 1 1 4 ...
## $ Controlled_treatments : Factor w/ 1 level "Yes": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ Type_of_sterilization : Factor w/ 4 levels "Castration","Hysterectomy",..: 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 3 1 ...
## $ Gonads_removed : Factor w/ 2 levels "No","Yes": 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
## $ Control_treatment : Factor w/ 4 levels "Intact (no surgery)",..: 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 ...
## $ Sex : Factor w/ 2 levels "Female","Male": 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 ...
## $ Day_to_matuarity : num [1:40] 42 42 70 90 70 90 70 42 42 42 ...
## $ Species_Latin : Factor w/ 3 levels "Mesocricetus auratus",..: 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 ...
## $ Species : Factor w/ 3 levels "Hampsters","Mice",..: 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 ...
## $ Strain : Factor w/ 17 levels "Albino","Balb/c",..: 11 11 14 7 7 10 10 4 4 5 ...
## $ Environment : Factor w/ 1 level "Laboratory": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ Wild_or_semi_wild : Factor w/ 1 level "No": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ Age_at_treatment : Factor w/ 29 levels "10 months","100 days",..: 1 1 25 22 23 12 12 4 4 14 ...
## $ Age_at_treatment_continuous : num [1:40] 304 304 2 40 41 45 45 21 21 152 ...
## $ Maturity_at_treatment : Factor w/ 8 levels "Adult","Adult (old)",..: 2 2 4 7 7 7 7 6 6 2 ...
## $ Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal : num [1:40] 4 4 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 4 ...
## $ Duration_of_treatment : logi [1:40] NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
## $ Shared_control : num [1:40] 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ...
## $ Control_lifespan_variable : num [1:40] 0.36 0.33 570 742 615 ...
## $ Treatment_lifespan_variable : num [1:40] 0.5 0.5 696 669 651 844 775 978 916 0.35 ...
## $ Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable : num [1:40] NA NA NA 615 742 ...
## $ Error_control : num [1:40] NA NA 122 24 21 ...
## $ Error_experimental : num [1:40] NA NA 132 26 26 ...
## $ Error_opposite_sex : num [1:40] NA NA NA 21 24 ...
## $ Lifespan_parameter : Factor w/ 3 levels "Mean","Median",..: 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 ...
## $ Lifespan_unit : Factor w/ 10 levels "~85 weeks.","11.5 months",..: 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 ...
## $ Error_unit : Factor w/ 5 levels "Probable error",..: NA NA 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 NA ...
## $ Error_control_SD : num [1:40] NA NA 122 170 148 ...
## $ Error_experimental_SD : num [1:40] NA NA 132 184 184 ...
## $ Error_opposite_sex_SD : num [1:40] NA NA NA 148 170 ...
## $ Coefficent_difference_to_control: logi [1:40] NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
## $ Lower_interval : logi [1:40] NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
## $ Upper_interval : logi [1:40] NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
## $ Coefficent_unit : logi [1:40] NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
## $ Sample_size_control : num [1:40] 16 16 12 50 50 50 50 18 27 20 ...
## $ Sample_size_sterilization : num [1:40] 16 16 8 50 50 50 50 24 22 20 ...
## $ Sample_size_opposite_sex : num [1:40] NA NA NA 50 50 50 50 27 18 NA ...
## $ Notes : Factor w/ 17 levels "\"average lifespan\" in months is also provided but no error. Calculated the percentage surviving to 30 months "| __truncated__,..: 10 10 NA 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
## $ Effect_ID : int [1:40] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
## $ Phylogeny : chr [1:40] "Mus_musculus" "Mus_musculus" "Rattus_norvegicus" "Rattus_norvegicus" ...
## $ Effect_type : chr [1:40] "mortality" "mortality" "longevity" "longevity" ...
## $ yi : num [1:40] 0.1962 0.2455 0.2007 -0.1036 0.0568 ...
## $ vi : num [1:40] 0.03179 0.03383 0.012 0.00232 0.00232 ...
This dataset is a part of the full data and only has data from rodent species.
All-combination data
This data sets is a subset of the main data and this includes only study which has all 4 groups: 1) control females, 2) control males, 3) treated females and 4) treated males.
# sdat <- read_csv(here('data', 'data2_15022022.csv'), na = c('', 'NA'))
<- read_csv(here("data", "data2_19042022.csv"), na = c("", "NA"))
sdat <- ifelse(str_detect(sdat$Lifespan_parameter, "Me"), "longevity", "mortality")
effect_type_s
# effect-level ID
$Effect_ID <- 1:nrow(sdat)
sdat$Phylogeny <- sub(" ", "_", sdat$Species_Latin)
sdat$Effect_type <- effect_type_s
sdat
kable(sdat, "html") %>%
kable_styling("striped", position = "left") %>%
scroll_box(width = "100%", height = "250px")
Order_extracted | Study | Controlled_treatments | Wild_or_semi_wild | Type_of_sterilization | Gonads_removed | Control_treatment | Species_Latin | Species | Strain | Environment | Age_at_treatment | Shared_control | Male_control_lifespan_variable | Error_male_control_SD | Sample_size_male_control | Male_sterilization_lifespan_variable | Error_male_sterilization_SD | Sample_size_male_sterilization | Female_control_lifespan_variable | Error_female_control_SD | Sample_size_female_control | Female_sterilization_lifespan_variable | Error_female_sterilization_SD | Sample_size_female_sterilization | Lifespan_parameter | Lifespan_unit | Notes | Effect_ID | Phylogeny | Effect_type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | Arriola Apelo et al 2020 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Mus musculus | Mice | C57BL6 | Laboratory | 21 days | 17 | 1006.00 | 145.522576 | 18 | 978.00 | 171.617460 | 24 | 853.00 | 136.399001 | 27 | 916.00 | 203.516494 | 22 | Median | days | NA | 1 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
19 | Asdell and Joshi 1976 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Manor-Wistar | Laboratory | 45 days old | 16 | 661.00 | 212.132034 | 50 | 775.00 | 212.132034 | 50 | 654.00 | 169.705627 | 50 | 844.00 | 169.705627 | 50 | Mean | days | NA | 2 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
17 | Asdell et al 1967 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Cornell Nutrion colony | Laboratory | Between 38-42 days | 14 | 615.00 | 148.492424 | 50 | 651.00 | 183.847763 | 50 | 742.00 | 169.705627 | 50 | 669.00 | 183.847763 | 50 | Mean | days | NA | 3 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
115 | Bronson 1981 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 92 | 4.97 | 3.660000 | 219 | 7.34 | 4.290000 | 265 | 6.65 | 5.660000 | 99 | 9.11 | 5.130000 | 220 | Mean | Years - for cats surviving to two years old | Lifespan of individuals calculated from histograms. Used data from animals that survived after the first year. | 4 | Felis_catus | longevity |
117 | Bronson 1982 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 94 | 8.00 | 5.200000 | 755 | 9.90 | 6.800000 | 54 | 7.70 | 4.400000 | 224 | 8.80 | 6.900000 | 528 | Mean (from those alive after 2) | Years | Mean lifespan is that of those that are alive from 2 years of age. The authors also provide lifespan from birth, but point out that animals are not usually sterilized until at least 6 months, so this doesnt provide a fair comparison | 5 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
72 | Hamilton 1965 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | Before 1 year | 57 | 3.20 | 2.741168 | 65 | 6.80 | 4.492661 | 60 | 7.70 | 5.178726 | 58 | 9.20 | 4.656522 | 28 | Mean | Years | Error displayed must be standard error not standard deviation. I initially interpreted the symbol used as standard deviation but actually it must be SEM, and this is what Hamilton usually uses. Otherwise they are abnormally low. | 6 | Felis_catus | longevity |
74 | Hamilton 1965 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | Before 1 year | 59 | 6.10 | 4.713343 | 51 | 8.50 | 4.913980 | 77 | 7.40 | 5.091169 | 50 | 8.40 | 4.762825 | 45 | Mean | Years | Error displayed must be standard error not standard deviation. I initially interpreted the symbol used as standard deviation but actually it must be SEM, and this is what Hamilton usually uses. Otherwise they are abnormally low. | 7 | Felis_catus | longevity |
33 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Felis catus | Cats | Outbred | Domestic | Various | 29 | 5.30 | 4.136520 | 97 | 8.10 | 4.820332 | 201 | 7.70 | 4.794163 | 85 | 8.20 | 4.503332 | 75 | Mean | Years | Pooled data for all ages which is consistent for both castrated and spayed of both sexes. | 8 | Felis_catus | longevity |
38 | Hamilton et al 1969 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Felis catus | Cats | Name breeds | Domestic | Various, median 6 months | 32 | 4.60 | 3.500000 | 25 | 6.90 | 4.971428 | 71 | 6.20 | 5.040000 | 36 | 8.20 | 4.723071 | 34 | Mean | Years | NA | 9 | Felis_catus | longevity |
57 | Hoffman et al 2018 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 47 | 10.86 | 3.327386 | 915 | 11.64 | 2.033618 | 844 | 10.86 | 3.685485 | 693 | 12.12 | 5.766116 | 921 | Mean | Years | Vetcompass database | 10 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
59 | Hoffman et al 2018 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 49 | 8.00 | 8.556337 | 14941 | 9.21 | 4.241509 | 11244 | 7.68 | 6.018372 | 7392 | 9.73 | 5.599714 | 19598 | Mean | Years | VMDB - individual data for breeds available in supplementary, but just mean lifespan without error | 11 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
76 | Huang et al 2017 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 61 | 9.00 | 5.941000 | 839 | 12.00 | 3.723000 | 332 | 10.00 | 5.947000 | 528 | 12.00 | 3.938000 | 607 | Median | Years | Interquartile range Intact, 5.0-13.0; castrated 9.0-14.0 | 12 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
43 | Kirkman and Yau | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Mesocricetus auratus | Hampsters | Syrian Hampsters | Laboratory | Unknown - not given | 35 | 632.00 | 222.910000 | 629 | 508.00 | 151.300000 | 72 | 543.00 | 222.950000 | 578 | 391.00 | 155.440000 | 31 | Mean | Days | Do not have error presented in paper. The proportion of animals dying in 10 brackets of different ages is presented that could be used (Figs 3 and 4). Upper and low quartiles estimated from figure 3 when number of animals dying in 100 day periods is given. Have used the middle number within this period for the quartile value (e.g. 550-850 for intact males, 350-550 for castrated males) | 13 | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity |
47 | Mitchel et al 1999 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 39 | 131.00 | 50.029192 | 1277 | 128.00 | 46.058550 | 291 | 130.00 | 51.951131 | 833 | 144.00 | 40.249224 | 720 | Mean | Months | Used all causes of death. Data collected on the basis of surveys that pet owners filled out about their last pets age at death | 14 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
94 | Muhlock 1959 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Mus musculus | Mouse | DBA | Laboratory | Weaning | 75 | 578.00 | 78.389183 | 60 | 595.00 | 102.322471 | 80 | 667.00 | 88.748529 | 86 | 627.00 | 87.987074 | 68 | Mean | days | Extracted data and calculated mean and SE from graph | 15 | Mus_musculus | longevity |
105 | Oneil et al 2013 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 83 | 11.99 | NA | 1464 | 11.99 | NA | 1224 | 11.59 | NA | 1082 | 12.39 | NA | 1304 | Mean | Years | Means calculated from the coefficient change in lifespan in Table 4. Sample size for all was known, SD was estimated | 16 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
107 | Oneil et al 2015 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Felis catus | Cats | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 85 | 12.81 | NA | 704 | 14.71 | NA | 1296 | 14.61 | NA | 707 | 15.21 | NA | 1302 | Mean | Years | Means calculated from the coefficient change in lifespan in Table 4. Sample size for each sex was estimated on the basis of the total sample size and the percentage that were known to be sterilized in both sexes, SD was estimated | 17 | Felis_catus | longevity |
30 | Reedy et al 2016 | Yes | Yes | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Anolis sagrei | Anole lizards | NA | Wild | Unknown - wild caught | 26 | 0.55 | NA | 60 | 0.28 | NA | 60 | 0.25 | NA | 110 | 0.21 | NA | 110 | Survival rate (%) | 10 weeks (of breeding season) | NA | 18 | Anolis_sagrei | mortality |
45 | Sichuk 1965 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Mesocricetus auratus | Hampsters | Syrian Hampsters | Laboratory | 6 weeks | 37 | 612.00 | 222.910000 | 92 | 578.00 | 151.300000 | 90 | 589.00 | 222.950000 | 94 | 586.00 | 155.440000 | 92 | Mean | Days | Use - SD from Kirkman & Yau;Error not provided. Mean lifespan comes from the lifespan of both those with thrumobis and those that do not have it. Calculated the mean of these two values weighed against the sample size of each group | 19 | Mesocricetus_auratus | longevity |
51 | Slonaker 1929 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Albino | Laboratory | 44 days | 43 | 788.00 | 32.987398 | 10 | 770.00 | 41.512231 | 8 | 863.00 | 41.052632 | 17 | 855.00 | 18.784285 | 60 | Mean | Days | Hyesterectomy female comparison | 20 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
51 | Slonaker 1929 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Rattus norvegicus | Rat | Albino | Laboratory | 44 days | 43 | 788.00 | 32.987398 | 10 | 770.00 | 41.512231 | 8 | 863.00 | 41.052632 | 17 | 755.00 | 32.839140 | 37 | Mean | Days | Ovariectomy female comparison | 21 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
63 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | Birth | 52 | 454.00 | 108.000000 | 36 | 521.00 | 174.979999 | 42 | 484.00 | 123.134073 | 42 | 574.00 | 183.736224 | 31 | Mean | Days | NA | 22 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
64 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | 22-28 days | 52 | 454.00 | 108.000000 | 36 | 488.00 | 165.650234 | 35 | 484.00 | 123.134073 | 42 | 480.00 | 206.378293 | 22 | Mean | Days | NA | 23 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
65 | Talbert and Hamilton 1965 | Yes | No | Castration | Yes | Sham surgery | Rattus norvegicus | Rats | Lewis | Laboratory | 100 days | 52 | 454.00 | 108.000000 | 36 | 439.00 | 119.895788 | 23 | 484.00 | 123.134073 | 42 | 515.00 | 183.357574 | 20 | Mean | Days | NA | 24 | Rattus_norvegicus | longevity |
87 | Urfer et al 2019 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Various breeds | Domestic | Various | 68 | 14.09 | 18.753700 | 322958 | 14.15 | 12.400487 | 909894 | 13.77 | 22.107487 | 230974 | 14.35 | 9.710121 | 906252 | Median | years | 95% confidence intervals Intact Male: 14.03-14.16; Castrated male: 14.13-14.18 | 25 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
159 | Tidiere 2016 | No | No | Unknown | Unknown | Intact (no surgery) | Varecia rubra | Red ruffed lemur | NA | Zoo | Unknown | 133 | 16.18 | 13.436925 | 927 | 19.40 | 11.495374 | 38 | 15.65 | 12.454792 | 689 | 19.84 | 10.210810 | 67 | Mean | Years | Data as described in Fig 7.3 of thesis, from 1 year of age and split for each species | 26 | Varecia_rubra | longevity |
161 | Tidiere 2016 | No | No | Unknown | Unknown | Intact (no surgery) | Varecia variegata | Black and white ruffed lemur | NA | Zoo | Unknown | 134 | 13.82 | 14.485185 | 1999 | 15.86 | 12.320698 | 37 | 13.95 | 13.122827 | 1542 | 18.03 | 12.489796 | 36 | Mean | Years | Data as described in Fig 7.3 of thesis, from 1 year of age and split for each species | 27 | Varecia_variegata | longevity |
129 | Kent et al 2018 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | Golden retriver | Domestic | Unknown | 106 | 8.68 | 3.230000 | 118 | 9.35 | 2.710000 | 228 | 5.89 | 3.270000 | 58 | 9.51 | 2.740000 | 248 | Median | Years | Standard deviation calculated from the range according to Wan et al 2014 | 28 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
136 | Robertson et al 1961 | No | No | Castration | Yes | untreated | Oncorhynchus nerka | Kokanee salmon | NA | Experimental pond | 2 years 1 month | 113 | 4.05 | 0.590000 | 41 | 5.31 | 1.600000 | 13 | 4.26 | 0.550000 | 58 | 5.89 | 1.630000 | 16 | Mean | Years | Only used data on animals that were found dead and did not have regenerating gonads. Mortality data is presented for a larger cohort that were also exposed to predation but control data is not seperated according to sex. | 29 | Oncorhynchus_nerka | longevity |
141 | Urfer et al 2020 | No | No | Castration | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Canis lupus | Dogs | NA | Various | Various | 117 | 15.00 | 17.598000 | 2115 | 15.20 | 16.530000 | 8567 | 14.10 | 20.090000 | 1551 | 15.80 | 16.670000 | 8711 | Median survival time | Years | Calculated SD looks high? Another MSL from age 5 years is provided by not sure of the sample size included | 30 | Canis_lupus | longevity |
162 | Larsen1969 | Yes | No | Gonadectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Lamperta fluviatilis | River Lamprey | NA | Lab but wild caught | Prior to sexual maturity - Jan | 135 | 0.10 | NA | 10 | 0.27 | NA | 10 | 0.10 | NA | 10 | 0.30 | NA | 10 | Survival rate (%) | May (after spawning) | Data extracted from Figures 6D in Larsen 1973 (thesis) and the published abstract | 31 | Lamperta_fluviatilis | mortality |
164 | Larsen 1973 | Yes | No | Gonadectomy | Yes | Intact (no surgery) | Lamperta fluviatilis | River Lamprey | NA | Lab but wild caught | Prior to sexual maturity - Either Jan or October prior year | 137 | 0.02 | NA | 50 | 0.25 | NA | 20 | 0.06 | NA | 17 | 0.25 | NA | 20 | Survival rate (%) | May (after spawning) | Data extracted from Figures 6E in Lrsden 1973 (thesis). Sample sizes at the start are in Table 11 | 32 | Lamperta_fluviatilis | mortality |
Calculating effect size for the matching data
# we create a longer data format
<- sdat
sdat1 <- sdat
sdat2 # lnRR
# here we create the ratio of M/F
$yi <- ifelse(effect_type_s == "longevity", lnrrm(sdat$Male_control_lifespan_variable,
sdat1$Female_control_lifespan_variable, sdat$Sample_size_male_control, sdat$Sample_size_female_control,
sdat"cv2_cont"]], cvs[["cv2_cont"]])[[1]], lnrrp(sdat$Male_control_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Female_control_lifespan_variable, sdat$Sample_size_male_control, sdat$Sample_size_female_control)[[1]])
sdat
$vi <- ifelse(effect_type_s == "longevity", lnrrm(sdat$Male_control_lifespan_variable,
sdat1$Female_control_lifespan_variable, sdat$Sample_size_male_control, sdat$Sample_size_female_control,
sdat"cv2_cont"]], cvs[["cv2_cont"]])[[2]], lnrrp(sdat$Male_control_lifespan_variable,
cvs[[$Female_control_lifespan_variable, sdat$Sample_size_male_control, sdat$Sample_size_female_control)[[2]])
sdat
# here we create CM/CF
$yi <- ifelse(effect_type_s == "longevity", lnrrm(sdat$Male_sterilization_lifespan_variable,
sdat2$Female_sterilization_lifespan_variable, sdat$Sample_size_male_sterilization,
sdat$Sample_size_female_sterilization, cvs[["cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_trt"]])[[1]],
sdatlnrrp(sdat$Male_sterilization_lifespan_variable, sdat$Female_sterilization_lifespan_variable,
$Sample_size_male_sterilization, sdat$Sample_size_female_sterilization)[[1]])
sdat
$vi <- ifelse(effect_type_s == "longevity", lnrrm(sdat$Male_sterilization_lifespan_variable,
sdat2$Female_sterilization_lifespan_variable, sdat$Sample_size_male_sterilization,
sdat$Sample_size_female_sterilization, cvs[["cv2_trt"]], cvs[["cv2_trt"]])[[2]],
sdatlnrrp(sdat$Male_sterilization_lifespan_variable, sdat$Female_sterilization_lifespan_variable,
$Sample_size_male_sterilization, sdat$Sample_size_female_sterilization)[[2]])
sdat
# merging sdata frames
<- rbind(sdat1, sdat2)
sdat_long
# putt 2 new column
$Obs <- factor(1:dim(sdat_long)[[1]])
sdat_long$Comp_type <- as.factor(rep(c("both_normal", "both_castrated"), each = dim(sdat_long)[[1]]/2)) sdat_long
Meta-data
# sdat <- read_csv(here('data', 'data2_15022022.csv'), na = c('', 'NA'))
<- read_csv(here("data", "data_meta-data.csv"))
mdat
kable(mdat, "html") %>%
kable_styling("striped", position = "left") %>%
scroll_box(width = "100%", height = "250px")
Order_extracted | Serial number of the order of effect size extration |
---|---|
Study | Study data was taken from |
Controlled_treatments | Whether treatment allocation and environments were derived in a controlled way |
Type_of_sterilization | Type of sterilization used |
Gonads_removed | Whether gonads were removed as part of the sterilization |
Control_treatment | Type of treatment/sham manipulation applied to controls |
Shamtreatment_moderator | Whether control groups involved sham treatments or not |
Sex | Sex in which the effect of sterilization was assessed |
Species_Latin | Latin name of species |
Species | Common name |
Strain | Strain of animal used where relevant |
Environment | Type of environment that effects were assessed in |
Wild_or_semi_wild | Whether the environment was wild/semi-wild or not |
Age_at_treatment | Information on age at which sterilization was conducted |
Maturity_at_treatment | When sterilization was conducted in relation to life stage |
Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal | When sterilization was conducted as an ordinal variable (1=birth; 2 = pre-puberty, 3 = puberty, 4 = adulthood) |
Duration_of_treatment | Duration of treatment if not permanent |
Shared_control | Shared numbers denote that a shared control or treatment group was used in each of these comparisons |
Control_lifespan_variable | Lifespan/survival variable for the control group |
Treatment_lifespan_variable | Lifespan/survival variable for the sterilized group |
Opposite_sex_lifespan_variable | Lifespan/survival variable for the opposite sex group if available |
Error_control | Error value for control group as extracted from the original source |
Error_experimental | Error value for sterilized group as extracted from the original source |
Error_opposite_sex | Error value for opposite sex group as extracted from the original source |
Lifespan_parameter | Type of survival data |
Lifespan_unit | Unit of measurement for survival data |
Error_unit | Unit of measurement for error in original source |
Error_control_SD | Standard deviation of control group |
Error_experimental_SD | Standard deviation of sterilized group |
Error_opposite_sex_SD | Standard deviation of opposite sex group |
Coefficent_difference_to_control | Coefficient estimate of difference to control group in lifespan from original source |
Lower_interval | Lower confidence interval for coefficient estimate |
Upper_interval | Upper confidence interval for coefficient estimate |
Coefficent_unit | Unit of measurement for coefficient estimate |
Sample_size_control | Sample size of control group |
Sample_size_sterilization | Sample size of sterilization group |
Sample_size_opposite_sex | Sample size of opposite sex group |
Notes | Notes on study and data extraction |
Summarise the dataset
Visualising missing data
General summary
- Number of effect sizes: 159
- Number of studies: 71
- Publication years: from to -
- Simple list of studies as short references: Kirkpatrick and Turner
2004, Jacob et al 2004 A, Jacob et al 2004 B, Twigg et al 2000, Gipps
and Jewel 1979, Zakeri et al 2019, Dorner 1973, Asdell et al 1967,
Asdell and Joshi 1976, Arriola Apelo et al 2020, Benedusi et al 2015,
Cargil et al 2003, Cox et al 2014, Cox and Calsbeek 2010, Cox et al
2010, Reedy et al 2016, Drori and Folman 1976, Garratt et al 2021,
Hamilton et al 1969, Waters et al 2011, Holland et al 1977, Kirkman and
Yau 1972, Sichuk 1965, Mitchel et al 1999, Moore et al 2001, Nieschlag
et al 1993, Slonaker 1930, Storer et al 1982, Hoffman et al 2018, Mason
et al 2009, Talbert and Hamilton 1965, Tapprest et al 2017, Hamilton
1965, Huang et al 2017, Min et al 2012, Williams et al 2007, Urfer et al
2019, Ramsey 2005, Ramsey et al 2021, Muhlock 1959, Jewel 1997, Iwasa et
al 2018, Hamilton and Mestler 1969, Oneil et al 2013, Oneil et al 2015,
Wilson et al 2019, Cheng 2019, Bronson 1981, Bronson 1982, Cox et al
2021, Skinner 2007, Kent et al 2018, Iversen et al 2007, Sato et al
1997, Aida et al 1984, Pullinger and Head 1964, Robertson et al 1961,
Saunders et al 2002, Collins and Kasbohn 2017, Urfer et al 2020,
Ossewaarde et al 2005, Hotchkiss 1995, Rocca et al 2006, Howard et al
2005, Phelan 1995, Manson et al 2013, Deleuze et al 2021, Wang et al
2021, Tidiere 2016, Larsen1969, Larsen 1973
- Number of species: 22
- Simple list of species Latin names (also stored in “Phylogeny”
variable): Equus ferus, Rattus argentiventer, Oryctolagus cuniculus,
Myodes glareolus, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Anolis sagrei, Felis
catus, Canis lupus, Mesocricetus auratus, Homo sapiens, Trichosurus
vulpecula, Phascolarctos cinereus, Ovis aries, Odocoileus virginianus,
Oncorhynchus masou, Oncorhynchus nerka, Vulpes vulpes, Macaca
fascicularis, Varecia rubra, Varecia variegata, Lamperta
fluviatilis
- Number of data points for females: 100, and data points form males: 59
# Key variables: Sex, Gonads_removed, Wild_or_semi_wild, Controlled_treatments,
# Effect_type, Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal (ordinal with NA), names(dat)
# check how crossed with Sex (relevant to both sexes or not?)
table(dat$Species_Latin, dat$Sex)
##
## Female Male
## Anolis sagrei 14 1
## Canis lupus 11 11
## Equus ferus 3 3
## Felis catus 6 8
## Homo sapiens 12 8
## Lamperta fluviatilis 2 2
## Macaca fascicularis 3 0
## Mesocricetus auratus 2 2
## Mus musculus 12 7
## Myodes glareolus 0 2
## Odocoileus virginianus 1 0
## Oncorhynchus masou 0 1
## Oncorhynchus nerka 1 1
## Oryctolagus cuniculus 9 0
## Ovis aries 0 3
## Phascolarctos cinereus 1 0
## Rattus argentiventer 5 0
## Rattus norvegicus 10 8
## Trichosurus vulpecula 4 0
## Varecia rubra 1 1
## Varecia variegata 1 1
## Vulpes vulpes 2 0
table(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, dat$Sex)
##
## Female Male
## No 64 55
## Yes 36 4
table(dat$Gonads_removed, dat$Sex) #always Yes in Males
##
## Female Male
## No 33 0
## Yes 65 57
table(dat$Controlled_treatments, dat$Sex)
##
## Female Male
## No 40 34
## Yes 60 25
table(dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, dat$Sex) #table(dat$Maturity_at_treatment)
##
## Female Male
## 1 1 5
## 2 13 16
## 3 4 4
## 4 46 11
table(dat$Effect_type, dat$Sex)
##
## Female Male
## longevity 37 45
## mortality 63 14
# check how crossed with Wild_or_semi_wild
table(dat$Gonads_removed, dat$Wild_or_semi_wild)
##
## No Yes
## No 10 23
## Yes 105 17
table(dat$Controlled_treatments, dat$Wild_or_semi_wild)
##
## No Yes
## No 67 7
## Yes 52 33
table(dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, dat$Wild_or_semi_wild)
##
## No Yes
## 1 3 3
## 2 29 0
## 3 8 0
## 4 33 24
table(dat$Effect_type, dat$Wild_or_semi_wild)
##
## No Yes
## longevity 80 2
## mortality 39 38
# check how crossed with Gonads_removed
table(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, dat$Gonads_removed)
##
## No Yes
## No 10 105
## Yes 23 17
table(dat$Controlled_treatments, dat$Gonads_removed)
##
## No Yes
## No 11 59
## Yes 22 63
table(dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, dat$Gonads_removed)
##
## No Yes
## 1 0 6
## 2 1 28
## 3 0 8
## 4 23 34
table(dat$Effect_type, dat$Gonads_removed)
##
## No Yes
## longevity 3 75
## mortality 30 47
# check how crossed with Controlled_treatments
table(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, dat$Controlled_treatments)
##
## No Yes
## No 67 52
## Yes 7 33
table(dat$Gonads_removed, dat$Controlled_treatments)
##
## No Yes
## No 11 22
## Yes 59 63
table(dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, dat$Controlled_treatments)
##
## No Yes
## 1 0 6
## 2 8 21
## 3 2 6
## 4 22 35
table(dat$Effect_type, dat$Controlled_treatments)
##
## No Yes
## longevity 52 30
## mortality 22 55
# check how crossed with Effect_type
table(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, dat$Effect_type)
##
## longevity mortality
## No 80 39
## Yes 2 38
table(dat$Gonads_removed, dat$Effect_type)
##
## longevity mortality
## No 3 30
## Yes 75 47
table(dat$Controlled_treatments, dat$Effect_type)
##
## longevity mortality
## No 52 22
## Yes 30 55
table(dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, dat$Effect_type)
##
## longevity mortality
## 1 3 3
## 2 21 8
## 3 7 1
## 4 15 42
Key predictors (moderators)
Visualise missing data in 6 key variables (moderators):
- Sex,
- Wild_or_semi_wild,
- Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal,
- Gonads_removed,
- Controlled_treatments,
- Effect_type
Visualize pairwise associations between 6 key variables:
Alluvial diagrams for key predictor variables (moderators) - two groups of 3 moderators, grouped by similarity:
For Sex, Gonads_removed, $ Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal (changed NA to 0)
# use ggalluvial
# (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggalluvial/vignettes/ggalluvial.html)
# create a frequency table for first 3 moderator variables freq_1 <-
# as.data.frame(table(dat$Sex, dat$Gonads_removed,
# dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal)) %>% rename(Sex = Var1, Gonads_removed =
# Var2, Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal = Var3)
# is_alluvia_form(as.data.frame(freq_1), axes = 1:3, silent = TRUE) #freq_1 %>%
# filter(Freq != 0) %>% arrange(desc(Freq)) #collapesd table of values, without
# 0s
# ggplot(data = freq_1, aes(axis1 = Sex, axis2 = Gonads_removed, axis3 =
# Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, y = Freq)) + geom_alluvium(aes(fill = Sex)) +
# geom_stratum(aes(fill = Sex))+ geom_text(stat = 'stratum', aes(label =
# after_stat(stratum))) + #theme_minimal() + theme_void() +
# theme(legend.position = 'none', plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, vjust
# = 3), axis.title.x = element_text(), axis.text.x = element_text(face='bold'))
# + scale_x_discrete(limits = c('Sex', 'Gonads removed', 'Maturity class'),
# expand = c(0.15, 0.05), position = 'top') + scale_fill_brewer(palette =
# 'Set3') + ggtitle('A. Subjects sex, manipulation type and maturity class')
# as above but with, but with Gonads_removed as first column, and different
# colours ggplot(data = freq_1, aes(axis1 = Gonads_removed, axis2 = Sex, axis3
# = Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, y = Freq)) + geom_alluvium(aes(fill =
# Gonads_removed)) + geom_stratum(aes(fill = Gonads_removed))+ geom_text(stat =
# 'stratum', aes(label = after_stat(stratum))) + theme_minimal() + #
# theme_void() + theme(legend.position = 'none', plot.title =
# element_text(hjust = 0.5, vjust = 3), axis.title.x = element_text(),
# axis.text.x = element_text(face='bold')) + scale_x_discrete(limits =
# c('Gonads_removed', 'Sex', 'Maturity class'), expand = c(0.15, 0.05),
# position = 'top') + scale_fill_brewer(palette = 'Pastel2') + ggtitle('A.
# Subjects sex, manipulation and maturity ')
# NOTE: all rows with NA in Maturity class are removed from the plot recode NA
# as 0
$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal2 <- dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal
dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal2[is.na(dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal2)] <- 0
dat# create a frequency table for first 3 moderator variables
<- as.data.frame(table(dat$Sex, dat$Gonads_removed, dat$Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal2)) %>%
freq_1 rename(Sex = Var1, Gonads_removed = Var2, Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal = Var3)
is_alluvia_form(as.data.frame(freq_1), axes = 1:3, silent = TRUE)
# freq_1 %>% filter(Freq != 0) %>% arrange(desc(Freq)) #collapesd table of
# values, without 0s
# ggplot(data = freq_1, aes(axis1 = Sex, axis2 = Gonads_removed, axis3 =
# Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal, y = Freq)) + geom_alluvium(aes(fill = Sex)) +
# geom_stratum(aes(fill = Sex))+ geom_text(stat = 'stratum', aes(label =
# after_stat(stratum))) + #theme_minimal() + theme_void() +
# theme(legend.position = 'none', plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, vjust
# = 3), axis.title.x = element_text(), axis.text.x = element_text(face='bold'))
# + scale_x_discrete(limits = c('Sex', 'Gonads removed', 'Maturity class'),
# expand = c(0.15, 0.05), position = 'top') + scale_fill_brewer(palette =
# 'Set3') + ggtitle('A. Subjects sex, manipulation type and maturity class')
# as above but with, but with Gonads_removed as first column, and different
# colours
ggplot(data = freq_1, aes(axis1 = Gonads_removed, axis2 = Sex, axis3 = Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal,
y = Freq)) + geom_alluvium(aes(fill = Gonads_removed)) + geom_stratum(aes(fill = Gonads_removed)) +
geom_text(stat = "stratum", aes(label = after_stat(stratum))) + theme_minimal() +
# theme_void() +
theme(legend.position = "none", plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, vjust = 3),
axis.title.x = element_text(), axis.text.x = element_text(face = "bold")) + scale_x_discrete(limits = c("Gonads_removed",
"Sex", "Maturity class"), expand = c(0.15, 0.05), position = "top") + scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Pastel2") +
ggtitle("A. Subjects sex, manipulation and maturity ")
For Wild_or_semi_wild, Controlled_treatments, & Effect_type (Outcome type)
# create a frequency table for next 3 moderator variables
<- as.data.frame(table(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, dat$Controlled_treatments, dat$Effect_type)) %>%
freq_2 rename(Wild_or_semi_wild = Var1, Controlled_treatments = Var2, Effect_type = Var3)
is_alluvia_form(as.data.frame(freq_2), axes = 1:3, silent = TRUE)
# freq_2 %>% filter(Freq != 0) %>% arrange(desc(Freq)) #collapesd table of
# values, without 0s
ggplot(data = freq_2, aes(axis1 = Wild_or_semi_wild, axis2 = Controlled_treatments,
axis3 = Effect_type, y = Freq)) + geom_alluvium(aes(fill = Wild_or_semi_wild)) +
geom_stratum(aes(fill = Wild_or_semi_wild)) + geom_text(stat = "stratum", aes(label = after_stat(stratum))) +
theme_minimal() + # theme_void() + theme_minimal() + # theme_void() +
theme(legend.position = "none", plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, vjust = 3),
axis.title.x = element_text(), axis.text.x = element_text(face = "bold")) + scale_x_discrete(limits = c("Wild_or_semi_wild",
"Controlled_treatments", "Outcome type"), expand = c(0.15, 0.05), position = "top") +
scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Pastel1") + ggtitle("B. Experimental settings and outcome type")
# names(dat_key)
For Gonads_removed, Wild_or_semi_wild, Controlled_treatments, & Effect_type (Outcome type)
# create a frequency table for next 3 moderator variables
<- as.data.frame(table(dat$Gonads_removed, dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, dat$Effect_type)) %>%
freq_3 rename(Gonads_removed = Var1, Wild_or_semi_wild = Var2, Effect_type = Var3)
is_alluvia_form(as.data.frame(freq_3), axes = 1:3, silent = TRUE)
# freq_2 %>% filter(Freq != 0) %>% arrange(desc(Freq)) #collapesd table of
# values, without 0s
ggplot(data = freq_3, aes(axis1 = Gonads_removed, axis2 = Wild_or_semi_wild, axis3 = Effect_type,
y = Freq)) + geom_alluvium(aes(fill = Gonads_removed)) + geom_stratum(aes(fill = Gonads_removed)) +
geom_text(stat = "stratum", aes(label = after_stat(stratum))) + theme_minimal() +
# theme_void() +
theme(legend.position = "none", plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, vjust = 3),
axis.title.x = element_text(), axis.text.x = element_text(face = "bold")) + scale_x_discrete(limits = c("Gonads_removed",
"Wild_or_semi_wild", "Outcome type"), expand = c(0.15, 0.05), position = "top") +
scale_fill_brewer(palette = "Set3") + ggtitle("C. Manipulation, subject and outcome types")
# names(dat_key)
This just shows a different combination of predictor variables (moderators) from plots A and B.
Building phylogenetic tree
Setting up
names(dat)
<- as.character(unique(dat$Species_Latin)) #get list of species
myspecies # str_sort(myspecies) #visual check length(myspecies) #23 species
# length(unique(myspecies)) #23 unique species names
Using rotl package to retrieve synthetic species tree from Open Tree of Life: Rotl is an R package (https://peerj.com/preprints/1471/) allowing access to synthetic phylogenetic tree available at Open Tree of Life database (https://opentreeoflife.org/).
<- tnrs_match_names(names = myspecies)
taxa dim(taxa) #40 specias - all matched
table(taxa$approximate_match) #1 approximate match
$approximate_match == TRUE, ] ##lamperta fluviatilis (search_string) will be presented as Perca fluviatilis (uniquw_name) taxa[taxa
Get the initial tree
<- tol_induced_subtree(ott_ids = taxa[["ott_id"]], label_format = "name")
tree # plot(tree, cex=.6, label.offset =.1, no.margin = TRUE) visual check
Check matching species & labels
# check overlap and differences with the taxa list
intersect(gsub("_", " ", tree$tip.label), myspecies) #22
setdiff(gsub("_", " ", tree$tip.label), myspecies) # 'Perca fluviatilis'
setdiff(myspecies, gsub("_", " ", tree$tip.label)) # 'Lamperta fluviatilis'
$tip.label <- gsub("Perca_fluviatilis", "Lamperta_fluviatilis", tree$tip.label) #replace with the original name
tree
# tree <- drop.tip(tree, 'Equus_caballus') re-check overlap and differences
# with myspecies list intersect(myspecies, tree2$tip.label) #23
# setdiff(myspecies, tree2$tip.label) #0 setdiff(tree2$tip.label, myspecies) #0
# check if the tree is really binary
is.binary.tree(tree) #TRUE
# tree_binary$node.label <- NULL #you can delete internal node labels *NOTE:*
# no branch lengths are included, they can be created later via simulations.
write.tree(tree, file = here("data", "tree_rotl.tre")) #save the tree
# *NOTE:* underscores within species names on tree tip labals are added
# automatically tree <- read.tree(file='plot_cooked_fish_MA.tre') #if you need
# to read in the tree tree$tip.label <- gsub('_',' ', tree$tip.label) #get rid
# of the underscores tree$node.label <- NULL #you can delete internal node
# labels
Plot phylogenetic tree
<- read.tree(here("data/tree_rotl.tre"))
tree
plot(tree, cex = 0.6, label.offset = 0.1, no.margin = TRUE)
# #or plot to pdf pdf(here('figs/rotl_tree.pdf'), width=8, heigh=10) plot(tree,
# cex=0.6, label.offset =.1, no.margin = TRUE) dev.off()
Meta-analysis: main
Main model
# VCV matrix to model shared control
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = dat$vi, cluster = dat$Shared_control, r = 0.5)
V_matrix
# phylogeny to model tree <- read.tree(here('data/tree_rotl.tre'))
<- compute.brlen(tree)
tree
<- vcv(tree, corr = TRUE)
cor_tree
# checking the match
match(unique(dat$Phylogeny), colnames(cor_tree))
## [1] 13 2 6 5 1 3 19 16 14 4 8 17 18 12 11 20 21 15 7 10 9 22
# meta-analysis basics phylogenetic model
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix, mod = ~1, random = list(~1 | Phylogeny, ~1 | Species_Latin,
mod ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID), R = list(Phylogeny = cor_tree), data = dat, test = "t",
sparse = TRUE, control = list(optimizer = "optim", optmethod = "Nelder-Mead"))
summary(mod)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.2903 -26.5806 -16.5806 -1.2676 -16.1858
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor R
## sigma^2.1 0.0003 0.0161 22 no Phylogeny yes
## sigma^2.2 0.0178 0.1333 22 no Species_Latin no
## sigma^2.3 0.0128 0.1132 71 no Study no
## sigma^2.4 0.0091 0.0956 159 no Effect_ID no
##
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 158) = 1387.1988, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## 0.1630 0.0400 4.0761 158 <.0001 0.0840 0.2420 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
round(i2_ml(mod), 2) # almost no phylogenetic effect
## I2_Total I2_Phylogeny I2_Species_Latin I2_Study
## 99.42 0.65 44.18 31.86
## I2_Effect_ID
## 22.74
# visualizing the result
orchard_plot(mod, xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study", data = dat)
# reduced model without phylogeny
# we use this as our base model for meta-regression
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix, mod = ~ 1,
mod2 random = list(#~1|Phylogeny,
~1|Species_Latin,
~1|Study,
~1|Effect_ID),
#R = list(Phylogeny = cor_tree),
data = dat,
test = "t",
sparse = TRUE,
control=list(optimizer="optim", optmethod="Nelder-Mead")
)summary(mod2)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.2899 -26.5799 -18.5799 -6.3295 -18.3185
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0179 0.1338 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0128 0.1131 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0091 0.0957 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 158) = 1387.1988, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## 0.1618 0.0388 4.1694 158 <.0001 0.0852 0.2385 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# we will not use robust for the analysis - they do not seem to change the results
# rob2.2 <- robust(mod2, cluster = Study, adjust=TRUE, clubSandwich=TRUE, verbose=TRUE)
# rob2.2
anova(mod, mod2) # they are not significantly different
##
## df AIC BIC AICc logLik LRT pval QE tau^2
## Full 5 -16.5806 -1.2676 -16.1858 13.2903 1387.1988 NA
## Reduced 4 -18.5799 -6.3295 -18.3185 13.2899 0.0007 0.9791 1387.1988 NA
Sex-wise species-level effect (Figure 1A)
# creating mod_table- results from the model
<- mod_results(mod, group = "Study", data = dat)[[1]]
results
# create a new cluster
$Phylo_Sex <- paste(dat$Phylogeny, dat$Sex , sep = "_" )
dat
# rho = 0.5 is as in Noble et al (Mol Ecol)
<- escalc(yi=yi, vi=vi, data = dat)
dat <- aggregate(dat, cluster=Phylo_Sex, struct="CS", rho = 0.5)
cdat
dim(dat)
dim(cdat)
# CI
$lower.ci <- cdat$yi - sqrt(cdat$vi) * qnorm(0.975)
cdat$upper.ci <- cdat$yi + sqrt(cdat$vi) * qnorm(0.975)
cdat
# adding more informaition
%>% select(Species_Latin, yi, lower.ci, upper.ci, Sex) -> ddat
cdat
<- data.frame(Species_Latin = "Overall", yi = NA,lower.ci = NA, upper.ci = NA, Sex = "Female")
addition
<- rbind(ddat, addition)
ddat
<- data.frame("x.diamond" = c(results$lowerCL,
sum_data $estimate ,
results$upperCL,
results$estimate ),
results"y.diamond" = c(1,
1 + 0.25,
1,
1 - 0.25)
)
$Species_Latin <- factor(ddat$Species_Latin,
ddatlevels = c("Overall",
"Lamperta fluviatilis", # fish
"Oncorhynchus nerka", # fish
"Oncorhynchus masou" , # fish
"Anolis sagrei" , # lizard
"Phascolarctos cinereus", #masp
"Trichosurus vulpecula", # masp?
"Oryctolagus cuniculus", # rabbit
"Mesocricetus auratus",
"Myodes glareolus", # voles
"Rattus norvegicus", # rat
"Rattus argentiventer" , #rat
"Mus musculus",
"Ovis aries",
"Equus ferus",
"Odocoileus virginianus" ,
"Vulpes vulpes",
"Canis lupus",
"Felis catus",
"Varecia variegata",
"Varecia rubra",
"Macaca fascicularis",
"Homo sapiens"
),labels = c("Overall",
"Lamperta fluviatilis", # fish
"Oncorhynchus nerka", # fish
"Oncorhynchus masou" , # fish
"Anolis sagrei" , # lizard
"Phascolarctos cinereus", #masp
"Trichosurus vulpecula", # masp?
"Oryctolagus cuniculus", # rabbit
"Mesocricetus auratus",
"Myodes glareolus", # voles
"Rattus norvegicus", # rat
"Rattus argentiventer" , #rat
"Mus musculus",
"Ovis aries",
"Equus ferus",
"Odocoileus virginianus" ,
"Vulpes vulpes",
"Canis lupus",
"Felis catus",
"Varecia variegata",
"Varecia rubra",
"Macaca fascicularis",
"Homo sapiens"
))
<- ggplot(data = ddat, aes(x = yi, y = Species_Latin)) +
phy_sex geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin = lower.ci, xmax = upper.ci, colour = Sex),
height = 0, show.legend = TRUE, size = 4.5, alpha = 0.8, position =position_dodge(width = 0.75)) +
geom_point(aes(col = Sex), fill = "white", size = 2, shape = 21, position =position_dodge2(width = 0.75)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 0, linetype = 2, colour = "black", alpha = 0.3) +
geom_vline(xintercept = mod$b, linetype = 1, colour = "red", alpha = 0.3) +
xlim(-1.6, 1.6) +
#creating 95% prediction intervals
geom_segment(data = results, ggplot2::aes(x = lowerPR, y = 1, xend = upperPR, yend = 1, group = name)) +
# creating diamonsts (95% CI)
::geom_polygon(data = sum_data, ggplot2::aes(x = x.diamond, y = y.diamond), fill = "red") +
ggplot2
theme_bw() +
scale_color_manual(values = c("#CC6677", "#88CCEE")) +
labs(x = "lnRR (effect size)", y = "", colour = "Sex") +
theme(legend.position= c(0.95, 0.85), legend.justification = c(1, 0)) +
theme(legend.title = element_text(size = 9)) +
#theme(legend.direction="horizontal") +
theme(axis.text.y = element_blank()) +
theme(axis.text.y = element_text(size = 10, colour ="black",
hjust = 0.5))
# adding incons
<- list.files("icons", pattern=".png", full.names=TRUE)
filenames <- lapply(filenames, readPNG)
ldf names(ldf) <- substr(filenames, 7, 60)
<- phy_sex +
p0 annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Lampetra_fluviatilis.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 1.5, ymax = 2.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Oncorhynchus_nerka.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 2.5, ymax = 3.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Oncorhynchus_masou.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 3.5, ymax = 4.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Anolis_sagrei.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 4.5, ymax = 5.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Phascolarctos_cinereus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 5.5, ymax = 6.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Trichosurus_vulpecula.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 6.5, ymax = 7.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Oryctolagus_cuniculus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 7.5, ymax = 8.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Mesocricetus_auratus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 8.5, ymax = 9.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Myodes_glareolus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 9.5, ymax = 10.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Rattus_norvegicus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 10.5, ymax = 11.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Rattus_argentiventer.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 11.5, ymax = 12.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Mus_musculus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 12.5, ymax = 13.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Ovis_aries.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 13.5, ymax = 14.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Equus_ferus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 14.5, ymax = 15.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Odocoileus_virginianus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 15.5, ymax = 16.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Vulpes_vulpes.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 16.5, ymax = 17.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Canis_lupus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 17.5, ymax = 18.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Felis_catus.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 18.5, ymax = 19.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Varecia_variegata.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 19.5, ymax = 20.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Varecia_rubra.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 20.5, ymax = 21.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Macaca_Fascicularis.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 21.5, ymax = 22.5) +
annotation_custom(rasterGrob(ldf$Homo_sapiens.png), xmin = -1.5, xmax = -1, ymin = 22.5, ymax = 23.5)
p0
Meta-regression: non-full models
Model function
# no phylogeny
<- function(formula) {
mod_func rma.mv(yi,
V = V_matrix,
mod = formula,
random = list(#~1|Phylogeny,
~1|Species_Latin,
~1|Study,
~1|Effect_ID),
#R = list(Phylogeny = cor_tree),
data = dat,
test = "t",
sparse = TRUE,
control=list(optimizer="optim", optmethod="Nelder-Mead")
#optmethod="BFGS")
) }
Sex difference (Sex
)
<- mod_func(formula = ~Sex - 1)
mod_sex summary(mod_sex)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 12.6642 -25.3283 -15.3283 -0.0471 -14.9310
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0176 0.1326 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0128 0.1131 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0095 0.0972 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1377.0170, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 157) = 8.7588, p-val = 0.0002
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## SexFemale 0.1601 0.0405 3.9519 157 0.0001 0.0801 0.2401 ***
## SexMale 0.1645 0.0448 3.6703 157 0.0003 0.0760 0.2531 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# contrast
<- mod_func(formula = ~Sex)
mod_sex1 summary(mod_sex1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 12.6642 -25.3283 -15.3283 -0.0471 -14.9310
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0176 0.1326 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0128 0.1131 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0095 0.0972 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1377.0170, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 0.0161, p-val = 0.8991
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.1601 0.0405 3.9519 157 0.0001 0.0801 0.2401 ***
## SexMale 0.0044 0.0349 0.1270 157 0.8991 -0.0645 0.0734
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_sex1)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.0001159238 0.7627304449
# orchard plot test <- mod_results(mod_sex1, mod = 'Sex', group = 'Study', data
# = dat)
<- orchard_plot(mod_sex1, mod = "Sex", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study",
p1 data = dat, cb = F, angle = 0)
p1
Gonad Removal (Sex_Gonads
)
# creating a new variable Sex + Gonad because
$Sex_Gonads <- paste(dat$Sex, dat$Gonads_removed, sep = "_")
dat
$Sex_Gonads[grep("NA", dat$Sex_Gonads)] <- NA
dat
$Sex_Gonads <- factor(dat$Sex_Gonads, levels = c("Female_No", "Female_Yes", "Male_Yes"),
datlabels = c("Gonads removed \n(female)", "Gonads not removed \n(female)", "Gonads removed \n(male)"))
<- mod_func(formula = ~Sex_Gonads - 1)
mod_rem summary(mod_rem)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 155; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 10.2552 -20.5104 -8.5104 9.6329 -7.9311
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0232 0.1523 20 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0110 0.1051 70 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0105 0.1023 155 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 152) = 1341.0829, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:3):
## F(df1 = 3, df2 = 152) = 4.8811, p-val = 0.0029
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(female) 0.1350 0.0560 2.4089 152 0.0172
## Sex_GonadsGonads not removed \n(female) 0.1742 0.0502 3.4694 152 0.0007
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(male) 0.1780 0.0514 3.4633 152 0.0007
## ci.lb ci.ub
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(female) 0.0243 0.2457 *
## Sex_GonadsGonads not removed \n(female) 0.0750 0.2734 ***
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(male) 0.0764 0.2795 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# contrast
<- mod_func(formula = ~Sex_Gonads)
mod_rem1 summary(mod_rem1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 155; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 10.2552 -20.5104 -8.5104 9.6329 -7.9311
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0232 0.1523 20 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0110 0.1051 70 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0105 0.1023 155 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 152) = 1341.0829, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:3):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 152) = 0.2784, p-val = 0.7574
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt 0.1350 0.0560 2.4089 152 0.0172
## Sex_GonadsGonads not removed \n(female) 0.0392 0.0560 0.6997 152 0.4852
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(male) 0.0430 0.0603 0.7132 152 0.4768
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0243 0.2457 *
## Sex_GonadsGonads not removed \n(female) -0.0715 0.1499
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(male) -0.0761 0.1621
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_rem1)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.00635652 0.76747820
# orchard plot
<- orchard_plot(mod_rem, mod = "Sex_Gonads", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
p2 group = "Study", data = dat, cb = F, angle = 0)
p2
Environmental (Wild_or_semi_wild
)
$Wild_or_semi_wild <- factor(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild, levels = c("No", "Yes"), labels = c("Others \n(e.g., lab, farm)",
dat"Wild or \nSemi-wild"))
<- mod_func(formula = ~Wild_or_semi_wild - 1)
mod_env summary(mod_env)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 14.8385 -29.6769 -19.6769 -4.3957 -19.2796
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0173 0.1315 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0151 0.1227 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0077 0.0875 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1263.2354, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 157) = 10.5379, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df
## Wild_or_semi_wildOthers \n(e.g., lab, farm) 0.1208 0.0443 2.7292 157
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild 0.2372 0.0551 4.3050 157
## pval ci.lb ci.ub
## Wild_or_semi_wildOthers \n(e.g., lab, farm) 0.0071 0.0334 0.2082 **
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild <.0001 0.1284 0.3461 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# contrast
<- mod_func(formula = ~Wild_or_semi_wild)
mod_env1 summary(mod_env1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 14.8385 -29.6769 -19.6769 -4.3957 -19.2796
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0173 0.1315 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0151 0.1227 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0077 0.0875 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1263.2354, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 3.7244, p-val = 0.0554
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt 0.1208 0.0443 2.7292 157 0.0071
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild 0.1164 0.0603 1.9299 157 0.0554
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0334 0.2082 **
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild -0.0027 0.2356 .
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_env1)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.06031414 0.81997475
# orchard plot
<- orchard_plot(mod_env1, mod = "Wild_or_semi_wild", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
p3 group = "Study", data = dat) + scale_fill_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73")) +
scale_colour_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73"))
p3
Controlled treatment (Controlled_treatments
)
$Controlled_treatments <- factor(dat$Controlled_treatments, levels = c("No", "Yes"),
datlabels = c("Not controlled", "Controlled"))
<- mod_func(formula = ~Controlled_treatments - 1)
mod_con summary(mod_con)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 14.0983 -28.1965 -18.1965 -2.9153 -17.7992
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0188 0.1372 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0116 0.1075 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0093 0.0967 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1173.2814, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 157) = 9.3003, p-val = 0.0002
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## Controlled_treatmentsNot controlled 0.1135 0.0567 2.0004 157 0.0472
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled 0.1982 0.0497 3.9914 157 0.0001
## ci.lb ci.ub
## Controlled_treatmentsNot controlled 0.0014 0.2256 *
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled 0.1001 0.2964 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# contrast
<- mod_func(formula = ~Controlled_treatments)
mod_con1 summary(mod_con1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 14.0983 -28.1965 -18.1965 -2.9153 -17.7992
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0188 0.1372 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0116 0.1075 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0093 0.0967 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1173.2814, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 1.3925, p-val = 0.2398
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb
## intrcpt 0.1135 0.0567 2.0004 157 0.0472 0.0014
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled 0.0848 0.0718 1.1800 157 0.2398 -0.0571
## ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.2256 *
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled 0.2266
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_con1)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.04331906 0.77499242
# orchard plot
<- orchard_plot(mod_con1, mod = "Controlled_treatments", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
p4 group = "Study", data = dat) + scale_fill_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73")) +
scale_colour_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73"))
p4
Sham (Shamtreatment_moderator
)
$Shamtreatment_moderator <- factor(dat$Shamtreatment_moderator, levels = c("No",
dat"Yes"), labels = c("No sham", "Sham-controlled"))
<- mod_func(formula = ~Shamtreatment_moderator - 1)
mod_sham summary(mod_sham)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.7380 -27.4760 -17.4760 -2.1948 -17.0786
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0247 0.1572 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0107 0.1032 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0091 0.0953 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1226.7067, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 157) = 8.4280, p-val = 0.0003
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## Shamtreatment_moderatorNo sham 0.1398 0.0465 3.0061 157 0.0031
## Shamtreatment_moderatorSham-controlled 0.2050 0.0522 3.9250 157 0.0001
## ci.lb ci.ub
## Shamtreatment_moderatorNo sham 0.0479 0.2317 **
## Shamtreatment_moderatorSham-controlled 0.1019 0.3082 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# contrast
<- mod_func(formula = ~Shamtreatment_moderator)
mod_sham1 summary(mod_sham1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.7380 -27.4760 -17.4760 -2.1948 -17.0786
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0247 0.1572 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0107 0.1032 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0091 0.0953 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1226.7067, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 1.7290, p-val = 0.1905
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt 0.1398 0.0465 3.0061 157 0.0031
## Shamtreatment_moderatorSham-controlled 0.0652 0.0496 1.3149 157 0.1905
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0479 0.2317 **
## Shamtreatment_moderatorSham-controlled -0.0328 0.1632
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_sham1)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.01989385 0.79966912
# orchard plot
<- orchard_plot(mod_sham, mod = "Shamtreatment_moderator", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
p5 group = "Study", data = dat) + scale_fill_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73")) +
scale_colour_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73"))
p5
Type of effect sizes (Effect_type
)
$Effect_type <- factor(dat$Effect_type, levels = c("longevity", "mortality"),
datlabels = c("Mean or meadian \nlongevity", "Mortality \n(%)"))
<- mod_func(formula = ~Effect_type - 1)
mod_eff summary(mod_eff)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.7440 -27.4881 -17.4881 -2.2068 -17.0907
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0167 0.1293 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0141 0.1188 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0090 0.0949 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1222.5851, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 157) = 9.4479, p-val = 0.0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## Effect_typeMean or meadian \nlongevity 0.1222 0.0523 2.3363 157 0.0207
## Effect_typeMortality \n(%) 0.1827 0.0430 4.2511 157 <.0001
## ci.lb ci.ub
## Effect_typeMean or meadian \nlongevity 0.0189 0.2255 *
## Effect_typeMortality \n(%) 0.0978 0.2676 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# contrast
<- mod_func(formula = ~Effect_type)
mod_eff1 summary(mod_eff1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.7440 -27.4881 -17.4881 -2.2068 -17.0907
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0167 0.1293 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0141 0.1188 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0090 0.0949 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1222.5851, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 1.2181, p-val = 0.2714
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb
## intrcpt 0.1222 0.0523 2.3363 157 0.0207 0.0189
## Effect_typeMortality \n(%) 0.0606 0.0549 1.1037 157 0.2714 -0.0478
## ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.2255 *
## Effect_typeMortality \n(%) 0.1689
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_eff1)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.02261499 0.77904949
# orchard plot
<- orchard_plot(mod_eff1, mod = "Effect_type", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
p6 group = "Study", data = dat, cb = F) + scale_fill_manual(values = c("#D55E00",
"#009E73")) + scale_colour_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73"))
p6
Matuarity (Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal
)
<- mod_func(formula = ~Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal)
mod_mat summary(mod_mat)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 100; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## -5.1049 10.2099 20.2099 33.1347 20.8620
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0144 0.1199 18 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0282 0.1681 51 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0045 0.0673 100 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 98) = 516.0643, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 98) = 2.2526, p-val = 0.1366
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb
## intrcpt 0.3615 0.1090 3.3159 98 0.0013 0.1452
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.0440 0.0293 -1.5009 98 0.1366 -0.1022
## ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.5779 **
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.0142
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_mat)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.04264234 0.90790792
# bubble plot
<- bubble_plot(mod_mat, xlab = "Life-course stages", ylab = "lnRR (effect size)",
p7 mod = "Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal", data = dat, group = "Study", cb = F)
p7
Sex x Matuarity
# interaction with Sex
<- mod_func(formula = ~Sex * Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal)
mod_sex_mat summary(mod_sex_mat)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 100; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## -1.4599 2.9198 16.9198 34.8703 18.1926
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0096 0.0980 18 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0311 0.1764 51 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0029 0.0541 100 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 96) = 506.8281, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:4):
## F(df1 = 3, df2 = 96) = 3.7971, p-val = 0.0127
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt 0.0273 0.1695 0.1614 96 0.8722
## SexMale 0.5087 0.1965 2.5886 96 0.0111
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.0459 0.0446 1.0292 96 0.3060
## SexMale:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.1712 0.0579 -2.9586 96 0.0039
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt -0.3091 0.3638
## SexMale 0.1186 0.8987 *
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.0426 0.1344
## SexMale:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.2860 -0.0563 **
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_mat)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.04264234 0.90790792
# different reference (gives whether male slope is significant)
<- mod_func(formula = ~relevel(Sex, ref = "Male") * Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal)
mod_sex_mat1 summary(mod_sex_mat1)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 100; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## -1.4599 2.9198 16.9198 34.8703 18.1926
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0096 0.0980 18 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0311 0.1764 51 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0029 0.0541 100 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 96) = 506.8281, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:4):
## F(df1 = 3, df2 = 96) = 3.7971, p-val = 0.0127
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate
## intrcpt 0.5360
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female -0.5087
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.1253
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.1712
## se tval
## intrcpt 0.1252 4.2808
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female 0.1965 -2.5886
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.0399 -3.1390
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.0579 2.9586
## df pval
## intrcpt 96 <.0001
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female 96 0.0111
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 96 0.0023
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 96 0.0039
## ci.lb
## intrcpt 0.2875
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female -0.8987
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.2045
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.0563
## ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.7846 ***
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female -0.1186 *
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.0461 **
## relevel(Sex, ref = "Male")Female:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.2860 **
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# bubble plot
<- bubble_plot(mod_sex_mat, xlab = "Life-course stages", ylab = "lnRR (effect size)",
p8 mod = "Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal", group = "Study", data = dat, by = "Sex")
p8
Figure 1
/(p1 | p2) + plot_layout(nrow = 2, heights = c(2.5, 1)) + plot_annotation(tag_levels = "A") p0
Figure 2
| p4)/(p5 | p6)/(p7 | p8) + plot_layout(nrow = 3, heights = c(1, 1, 1.5)) + plot_annotation(tag_levels = "A") (p3
Meta-regression: full model
Full model
# at least 10 in each group (sex * wild = male wild is too few - 4)
<- mod_func(formula = ~Sex_Gonads + Sex * Controlled_treatments + Wild_or_semi_wild +
mod_full * Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal)
Sex summary(mod_full)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 100; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## -2.4213 4.8426 26.8426 54.5823 30.1426
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0180 0.1340 18 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0280 0.1672 51 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0040 0.0629 100 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 92) = 380.2741, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:8):
## F(df1 = 7, df2 = 92) = 1.6012, p-val = 0.1449
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt -0.0030 0.1977 -0.0150 92 0.9881
## Sex_GonadsGonads not removed \n(female) 0.0017 0.0545 0.0307 92 0.9755
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(male) 0.6038 0.2410 2.5049 92 0.0140
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled 0.0376 0.0925 0.4062 92 0.6855
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild -0.0314 0.1042 -0.3011 92 0.7640
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal 0.0537 0.0472 1.1376 92 0.2583
## SexMale:Controlled_treatmentsControlled -0.1057 0.1392 -0.7597 92 0.4494
## SexMale:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.1758 0.0602 -2.9231 92 0.0044
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt -0.3956 0.3896
## Sex_GonadsGonads not removed \n(female) -0.1065 0.1099
## Sex_GonadsGonads removed \n(male) 0.1250 1.0825 *
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled -0.1462 0.2214
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild -0.2383 0.1756
## Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.0401 0.1475
## SexMale:Controlled_treatmentsControlled -0.3821 0.1707
## SexMale:Maturity_at_treatment_ordinal -0.2953 -0.0564 **
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_full)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.1285086 0.9309425
AIC model selection
# res_mod_full <- dredge(mod_full, trace=2)
<- dredge(mod_full, trace = 2)
res_mod_full
saveRDS(res_mod_full, file = here("Rdata", "res_mod_full"))
<- readRDS(file = here("Rdata", "res_mod_full"))
res_mod_full
# delta AIC = 2
<- subset(res_mod_full, delta <= 2) #, recalc.weights=FALSE)
res_mod_full2
# the best model according to the delta 2
<- mod_func(formula = ~Controlled_treatments + Wild_or_semi_wild)
best2 # summary(best2)
# model varaged coeffisents
<- model.avg(res_mod_full2)
avg2 summary(avg2) # similar to the orignal resulde
##
## Call:
## model.avg(object = res_mod_full2)
##
## Component model call:
## rma.mv(yi = yi, V = V_matrix, mods = ~<4 unique rhs>, random = list(~1
## | Species_Latin, ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID), data = dat, test = t,
## sparse = TRUE, control = list(optimizer = "optim", optmethod =
## "Nelder-Mead"))
##
## Component models:
## df logLik AICc delta weight
## 2 5 14.84 -19.28 0.00 0.38
## (Null) 4 13.29 -18.32 0.96 0.24
## 12 6 15.25 -17.95 1.34 0.20
## 1 5 14.10 -17.80 1.48 0.18
##
## Term codes:
## Controlled_treatments Wild_or_semi_wild
## 1 2
##
## Model-averaged coefficients:
## (full average)
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## intrcpt 0.12316 0.05473 2.250 0.0244 *
## Wild_or_semi_wildYes 0.06579 0.07279 0.904 0.3661
## Controlled_treatmentsSham-controlled 0.02739 0.05755 0.476 0.6341
##
## (conditional average)
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## intrcpt 0.12316 0.05473 2.250 0.0244 *
## Wild_or_semi_wildYes 0.11342 0.06109 1.856 0.0634 .
## Controlled_treatmentsSham-controlled 0.07219 0.07412 0.974 0.3301
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# note controlling and wild-semi-wide is correlated: r = 0.34
# cor.test(as.numeric(dat$Controlled_treatments),as.numeric(dat$Wild_or_semi_wild))
Publication bais & sensitivity analysis
Funnel plot
# raw funnel plot funnel plot -
funnel(mod)
# residual funnel plot
funnel(best2)
Small-study effect: uni-moderaotor
$Effective_N <- 1/dat$Sample_size_sterilization + 1/dat$Sample_size_control
dat
<- mod_func(formula = ~sqrt(Effective_N))
egger_uni # egger_uni2 <- mod_func(formula = ~ Effective_N)
summary(egger_uni)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 17.0315 -34.0630 -24.0630 -8.7818 -23.6657
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0197 0.1404 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0052 0.0722 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0120 0.1095 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1257.7807, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 9.4610, p-val = 0.0025
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0468 0.0531 0.8825 157 0.3788 -0.0580 0.1517
## sqrt(Effective_N) 0.6238 0.2028 3.0759 157 0.0025 0.2232 1.0244 **
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# egger_uni2 <- mod_func(formula = ~ Effective_N) summary(egger_uni2)
Decline effect (time lag bias): uni-moderator
$Year <- as.numeric(str_extract(as.character(dat$Study), "[:digit:][:digit:][:digit:][:digit:]"))
dat
<- mod_func(formula = ~Year)
decline_uni summary(decline_uni)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 13.2140 -26.4280 -16.4280 -1.1468 -16.0307
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0176 0.1326 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0134 0.1159 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0091 0.0956 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 157) = 1335.5062, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 157) = 0.0138, p-val = 0.9065
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.4684 2.6079 0.1796 157 0.8577 -4.6827 5.6196
## Year -0.0002 0.0013 -0.1176 157 0.9065 -0.0027 0.0024
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Mulit-moderator model for both the small-study & decline effects
$cYear <- scale(dat$Year, scale = F)
dat
<- mod_func(formula = ~Effective_N + Controlled_treatments + Wild_or_semi_wild +
pub_bias
cYear)
summary(pub_bias)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 159; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 18.6361 -37.2721 -21.2721 3.0235 -20.2790
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0184 0.1358 22 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0096 0.0979 71 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0093 0.0967 159 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 154) = 1072.0218, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:5):
## F(df1 = 4, df2 = 154) = 3.0262, p-val = 0.0195
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt 0.0570 0.0588 0.9699 154 0.3336
## Effective_N 1.3047 0.4609 2.8312 154 0.0053
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled 0.0149 0.0742 0.2014 154 0.8406
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild 0.1000 0.0621 1.6093 154 0.1096
## cYear -0.0004 0.0013 -0.3509 154 0.7261
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt -0.0591 0.1732
## Effective_N 0.3943 2.2152 **
## Controlled_treatmentsControlled -0.1317 0.1616
## Wild_or_semi_wildWild or \nSemi-wild -0.0228 0.2228
## cYear -0.0029 0.0021
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
<- qdrg(object = pub_bias, data = dat, at = list(Effective_N = 0, cYear = 0))
prep1
# this seems the most appropriate to report equal averaging
<- emmeans(prep1, specs = "1", df = pub_bias$ddf, weights = "equal")
res1 res1
## 1 emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## overall 0.114 0.045 154 0.0256 0.203
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Controlled_treatments, Wild_or_semi_wild
## Degrees-of-freedom method: user-specified
## Confidence level used: 0.95
# proportional to what we have
<- emmeans(prep1, specs = "1", df = pub_bias$ddf, weights = "prop")
res2 res2
## 1 emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## overall 0.0902 0.0441 154 0.00298 0.177
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Controlled_treatments, Wild_or_semi_wild
## Degrees-of-freedom method: user-specified
## Confidence level used: 0.95
Leave-one-study-out analysis
# The function for leave-one-study-out
$Study <- as.factor(dat$Study)
dat
<- list()
LeaveOneOut_effectsize for (i in 1:length(levels(dat$Study))) {
<- dat[dat$Study != levels(dat$Study)[i], ]
dat1 <- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = dat1$vi, cluster = dat1$Shared_control,
V_matrix r = 0.5)
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix, random = list(~1 | Species_Latin,
LeaveOneOut_effectsize[[i]] ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID), test = "t", sparse = TRUE, control = list(optimizer = "optim",
optmethod = "BFGS"), data = dat1)
}
# writing function for extracting est, ci.lb, and ci.ub from all models
<- function(mod) {
est.func <- data.frame(est = mod$b, lower = mod$ci.lb, upper = mod$ci.ub)
df return(df)
}
# using dplyr to form data frame
<- lapply(LeaveOneOut_effectsize, function(x) est.func(x)) %>%
MA_LOO %>%
bind_rows mutate(left_out = levels(dat$Study))
saveRDS(MA_LOO, file = here("Rdata", "MA_LOO.rds"))
# telling ggplot to stop reordering factors
<- readRDS(file = here("Rdata", "MA_LOO.rds"))
MA_LOO
$left_out <- as.factor(MA_LOO$left_out)
MA_LOO$left_out <- factor(MA_LOO$left_out, levels = MA_LOO$left_out)
MA_LOO
# plotting
<- ggplot(MA_LOO) + geom_hline(yintercept = 0, lty = 2, lwd = 1) +
leaveoneout_E geom_hline(yintercept = mod$ci.lb, lty = 3, lwd = 0.75, colour = "black") + geom_hline(yintercept = mod$b,
lty = 1, lwd = 0.75, colour = "black") + geom_hline(yintercept = mod$ci.ub, lty = 3,
lwd = 0.75, colour = "black") + geom_pointrange(aes(x = left_out, y = est, ymin = lower,
ymax = upper)) + xlab("Study left out") + ylab("lnRR, 95% CI") + coord_flip() +
theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank()) + theme_bw() + theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank()) +
theme(panel.grid.minor.x = element_blank()) + theme(axis.text.y = element_text(size = 6))
leaveoneout_E
Meta-analysis: rodent data only
We note that the analyses below using rodent data are post-host analyses.
Main model
# shared control this does not seem to work V_matrix <- make_VCV_matrix(dat, V=
# 'vi', cluster = 'Shared_control', obs = 'Effect_ID')
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = rdat$vi, cluster = rdat$Shared_control,
V_matrix r = 0.5)
# meta-analysis basics phylo model
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix, mod = ~1, random = list(~1 | Species_Latin, ~1 |
rmod ~1 | Effect_ID), data = rdat, test = "t", sparse = TRUE, control = list(optimizer = "optim",
Study, optmethod = "Nelder-Mead"))
summary(rmod)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 40; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 23.9404 -47.8807 -39.8807 -33.2265 -38.7043
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0018 0.0423 3 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0089 0.0941 23 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0027 0.0522 40 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 39) = 176.6345, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## 0.0650 0.0380 1.7128 39 0.0947 -0.0118 0.1418 .
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
i2_ml(rmod)
## I2_Total I2_Species_Latin I2_Study I2_Effect_ID
## 86.13553 11.50770 57.04649 17.58134
# visualizing the result
orchard_plot(rmod, xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study", data = rdat)
Sex difference (Sex
)
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix, mod = ~Sex, random = list(~1 | Species_Latin,
rmod_sex ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID), data = rdat, test = "t", sparse = TRUE, control = list(optimizer = "optim",
optmethod = "Nelder-Mead"))
summary(rmod_sex)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 40; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 22.6144 -45.2289 -35.2289 -27.0409 -33.3539
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0017 0.0414 3 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0088 0.0936 23 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0029 0.0543 40 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 38) = 164.4126, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 38) = 0.0501, p-val = 0.8241
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0617 0.0403 1.5290 38 0.1345 -0.0200 0.1434
## SexMale 0.0074 0.0333 0.2238 38 0.8241 -0.0599 0.0748
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(rmod_sex)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.001033388 0.780759740
# visualizing the result
orchard_plot(rmod_sex, mod = "Sex", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study",
data = rdat)
Maturity (in days)
# two more type of ages
$lnAge_Trt <- log(rdat$Age_at_treatment_continuous)
rdat$Age_ratio <- (rdat$Age_at_treatment_continuous/rdat$Day_to_matuarity)
rdat$lnAge_ratio <- log(rdat$Age_at_treatment_continuous/rdat$Day_to_matuarity)
rdat
# just pure effect
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix, mod = ~lnAge_ratio * Sex, random = list(~1 |
rmod_mat ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID), data = rdat, test = "t", sparse = TRUE,
Species_Latin, control = list(optimizer = "optim", optmethod = "Nelder-Mead"))
summary(rmod_mat)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 40; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 21.8680 -43.7360 -29.7360 -18.6514 -25.7360
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0006 0.0237 3 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0108 0.1037 23 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0016 0.0396 40 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 36) = 147.1755, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:4):
## F(df1 = 3, df2 = 36) = 1.7831, p-val = 0.1678
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0590 0.0347 1.7003 36 0.0977 -0.0114 0.1294 .
## lnAge_ratio -0.0192 0.0152 -1.2562 36 0.2171 -0.0501 0.0118
## SexMale 0.0037 0.0327 0.1137 36 0.9101 -0.0626 0.0701
## lnAge_ratio:SexMale -0.0102 0.0201 -0.5056 36 0.6162 -0.0510 0.0307
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(rmod_mat)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.09196419 0.88970527
# visualizing the result
bubble_plot(rmod_mat, mod = "lnAge_ratio", group = "Study", data = rdat, by = "Sex",
xlab = "ln(Treatment Day/Day to sexual maturity) [Rodent data only]", ylab = "ln(Response ratio)")
Contrasting sexes: full data
Calcuating aboslute effect sizes
# full data
<- dat_long %>%
dat_long mutate(abs_yi = folded_mu(yi, vi), abs_vi = folded_v(yi, vi))
# partial data
<- sdat_long %>%
sdat_long mutate(abs_yi = folded_mu(yi, vi), abs_vi = folded_v(yi, vi))
Comparing M/F vs. M\(\star\)/F or M/F\(\star\)
# variance covariance matrix
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = dat_long$vi, cluster = dat_long$Shared_control,
V_matrix_long r = 0.5)
# we can run - some heteroscad models this does not improve model
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type - 1, random = list(~1 |
mod_comp ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID, ~1 | Obs), data = dat_long, test = "t")
Species_Latin, summary(mod_comp)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 170; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 4.4256 -8.8513 3.1487 21.8925 3.6705
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0201 0.1417 15 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 34 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0000 0.0000 85 no Effect_ID
## sigma^2.4 0.0229 0.1513 170 no Obs
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 168) = 1521.8257, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 168) = 0.1197, p-val = 0.8873
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## Comp_typeboth_normal 0.0190 0.0463 0.4102 168 0.6822 -0.0724 0.1104
## Comp_typeone_castrated 0.0078 0.0459 0.1709 168 0.8645 -0.0827 0.0984
##
## Comp_typeboth_normal
## Comp_typeone_castrated
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_comp)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.0007280653 0.4676277813
# visualizing the result
orchard_plot(mod_comp, mod = "Comp_type", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study",
data = dat_long, cb = F)
Separating by sex (M/F vs. M\(\star\)/F or M/F\(\star\))
# naming factors dat_long$Comp_type <- factor(dat_long$Comp_type, levels =
# c('one_castrated', 'both_normal'), labels = c('one_castrated', 'both_normal')
# )
$Comp_type_Sex1 <- factor(dat_long$Comp_type_Sex, levels = c("one_castrated_Male",
dat_long"both_normal_Male", "one_castrated_Female", "both_normal_Female"), labels = c("Male sterlized/\nFemale normal",
"Male normal/\nFemale normal (B)", "Male normal/\nFemale sterlized", "Male normal/\nFemale normal (A)"))
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type_Sex1 - 1, random = list(~1 |
mod_comp_sex ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID, ~1 | Obs), data = dat_long, test = "t")
Species_Latin, summary(mod_comp_sex)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 170; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 23.2985 -46.5969 -30.5969 -5.7010 -29.6797
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0200 0.1415 15 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 34 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0000 0.0000 85 no Effect_ID
## sigma^2.4 0.0146 0.1207 170 no Obs
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 166) = 1177.6380, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
## F(df1 = 4, df2 = 166) = 11.7696, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df
## Comp_type_Sex1Male sterlized/\nFemale normal 0.1356 0.0489 2.7708 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (B) -0.0103 0.0494 -0.2088 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale sterlized -0.1036 0.0484 -2.1390 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (A) 0.0545 0.0489 1.1127 166
## pval ci.lb ci.ub
## Comp_type_Sex1Male sterlized/\nFemale normal 0.0062 0.0390 0.2322 **
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (B) 0.8348 -0.1080 0.0873
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale sterlized 0.0339 -0.1992 -0.0080 *
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (A) 0.2675 -0.0422 0.1511
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_comp_sex)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.1828964 0.6560378
<- orchard_plot(mod_comp_sex, mod = "Comp_type_Sex1", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
d0 group = "Study", data = dat_long, cb = T, angle = 90) + geom_vline(xintercept = 2.5,
size = 0.2)
d0
Absolute effect size comparaion (M/F or F/M vs. M\(\star\)/F or F\(\star\)/M)
# VCV matrix
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = dat_long$abs_vi, cluster = dat_long$Shared_control,
abs_V_matrix_long r = 0.5)
<- rma.mv(abs_yi, V = abs_V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type_Sex1,
abs_mod_comp_sex0 random = list(~1 | Species_Latin, ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID, ~1 | Obs), data = dat_long,
test = "t")
summary(abs_mod_comp_sex0)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 170; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 92.6456 -185.2912 -169.2912 -144.3953 -168.3740
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0050 0.0707 15 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0011 0.0337 34 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0000 0.0000 85 no Effect_ID
## sigma^2.4 0.0048 0.0696 170 no Obs
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 166) = 947.2720, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 2:4):
## F(df1 = 3, df2 = 166) = 9.5512, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df
## intrcpt 0.1555 0.0288 5.3956 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (B) 0.0113 0.0226 0.5023 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale sterlized 0.0973 0.0269 3.6187 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (A) -0.0092 0.0269 -0.3430 166
## pval ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt <.0001 0.0986 0.2124 ***
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (B) 0.6161 -0.0332 0.0559
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale sterlized 0.0004 0.0442 0.1504 ***
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (A) 0.7320 -0.0624 0.0440
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
<- rma.mv(abs_yi, V = abs_V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type_Sex1 -
abs_mod_comp_sex 1, random = list(~1 | Species_Latin, ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID, ~1 | Obs), data = dat_long,
test = "t")
summary(abs_mod_comp_sex)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 170; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 92.6456 -185.2912 -169.2912 -144.3953 -168.3740
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0050 0.0707 15 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0011 0.0337 34 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0000 0.0000 85 no Effect_ID
## sigma^2.4 0.0048 0.0696 170 no Obs
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 166) = 947.2720, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
## F(df1 = 4, df2 = 166) = 20.6516, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df
## Comp_type_Sex1Male sterlized/\nFemale normal 0.1555 0.0288 5.3956 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (B) 0.1668 0.0293 5.7011 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale sterlized 0.2528 0.0289 8.7427 166
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (A) 0.1462 0.0288 5.0751 166
## pval ci.lb ci.ub
## Comp_type_Sex1Male sterlized/\nFemale normal <.0001 0.0986 0.2124 ***
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (B) <.0001 0.1090 0.2246 ***
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale sterlized <.0001 0.1957 0.3098 ***
## Comp_type_Sex1Male normal/\nFemale normal (A) <.0001 0.0893 0.2031 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(abs_mod_comp_sex)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.1450346 0.6228585
# visualizing results
<- orchard_plot(abs_mod_comp_sex, mod = "Comp_type_Sex1", xlab = "absolute log response ratio (lnRR)",
d1 group = "Study", data = dat_long, cb = T, angle = 90) + geom_vline(xintercept = 2.5,
size = 0.2)
d1
Contrasting M/F and M/F\(\star\)
# female
<- dat_long %>%
female_dat_log filter(Sex == "Female")
<- female_dat_log %>%
f_dat_log group_by(Effect_ID) %>%
summarise(yi2 = abs_yi[2] - abs_yi[1], vi2 = abs_vi[1] + abs_vi[2] - 0.5 * sqrt(abs_vi[1] *
2]), Species_Latin = Species_Latin[1], Study = Study[1], Shared_control = Shared_control[1])
abs_vi[
# variance covariance matrix
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = f_dat_log$vi2, cluster = f_dat_log$Shared_control,
V_matrix_long1 r = 0.5)
# we can run - some heteroscad models this does not improve model
<- rma.mv(yi2, V = V_matrix_long1, random = list(~1 | Species_Latin, ~1 |
f_mod_long ~1 | Effect_ID), data = f_dat_log, test = "t")
Study, summary(f_mod_long)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 44; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 23.2097 -46.4193 -38.4193 -31.3745 -37.3667
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0045 0.0672 13 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 28 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0035 0.0595 44 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 43) = 168.9263, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## 0.0904 0.0320 2.8227 43 0.0072 0.0258 0.1549 **
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
i2_ml(f_mod_long)
## I2_Total I2_Species_Latin I2_Study I2_Effect_ID
## 7.053045e+01 3.952129e+01 4.435228e-07 3.100916e+01
# Pair figures
<- ggplot(female_dat_log, aes(x = Comp_type, y = abs_yi)) + geom_point(aes(size = sqrt(1/abs_vi),
d2 col = Comp_type), alpha = 0.5) + geom_line(aes(group = Effect_ID), alpha = 0.5) +
labs(y = "absolute log response ratio (lnRR)", x = "", size = "Precision (1/SE)") +
scale_x_discrete(labels = c(one_castrated = "Male normal/\nFemale sterlized",
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ both_normal
= "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ =
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ "Male
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ normal/\nFemale
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ normal"))
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ +
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+ #xlim(c('one_castrated','both_normal'))+
both_normal ylim(0, 1.25) + scale_color_manual(values = c("#DDCC77", "#117733")) + coord_flip() +
theme_bw() + guides(colour = "none") + theme(legend.position = c(1, 0), legend.justification = c(1,
0)) + theme(legend.title = element_text(size = 9)) + theme(legend.direction = "horizontal") +
theme(legend.background = element_blank()) + theme(axis.text.y = element_text(size = 10,
colour = "black", hjust = 0.5, angle = 90))
d2
<- orchard_plot(f_mod_long, xlab = "absolute log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study",
d3 data = f_dat_log, cb = F, angle = 90) + scale_fill_manual(values = "#999933") +
scale_colour_manual(values = "#999933") + scale_x_discrete(labels = "Male normal/Female sterlized vs. \nMale normal/Female normal") +
ylim(-0.9, 0.5)
d3
Contrasting M/F and M\(\star\)/F
# pair figure male
<- dat_long %>%
male_dat_log filter(Sex == "Male")
<- male_dat_log %>%
m_dat_log group_by(Effect_ID) %>%
summarise(yi2 = abs_yi[2] - abs_yi[1], vi2 = abs_vi[1] + abs_vi[2] - 0.5 * sqrt(abs_vi[1] *
2]), Species_Latin = Species_Latin[1], Study = Study[1], Shared_control = Shared_control[1])
abs_vi[
# variance covariance matrix
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = m_dat_log$vi2, cluster = m_dat_log$Shared_control,
V_matrix_long2 r = 0.5)
# we can run - some hetero-scad models this does not improve model
<- rma.mv(yi2, V = V_matrix_long2, random = list(~1 | Species_Latin, ~1 |
m_mod_long ~1 | Effect_ID), data = m_dat_log, test = "t")
Study, summary(m_mod_long)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 41; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 11.4025 -22.8051 -14.8051 -8.0495 -13.6622
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0234 0.1530 12 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0002 0.0148 28 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0021 0.0454 41 no Effect_ID
##
## Test for Heterogeneity:
## Q(df = 40) = 105.9507, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval ci.lb ci.ub
## -0.0123 0.0531 -0.2307 40 0.8188 -0.1197 0.0951
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
i2_ml(m_mod_long)
## I2_Total I2_Species_Latin I2_Study I2_Effect_ID
## 93.3494808 85.0605985 0.7915758 7.4973065
<- ggplot(male_dat_log, aes(x = Comp_type, y = abs_yi)) + geom_point(aes(size = sqrt(1/abs_vi),
d4 col = Comp_type), alpha = 0.5) + geom_line(aes(group = Effect_ID), alpha = 0.5) +
labs(y = "absolute log response ratio (lnRR)", x = "", size = "Precision (1/SE)") +
scale_x_discrete(labels = c(one_castrated = "Male sterlized/\nFemale normal",
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + both_normal
= "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + =
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + "Male
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + normal/\nFemale
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + normal"))
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + +
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + ylim(0,
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + 1.25)
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + +
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + #coord_cartesian(xlim
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + =
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + c(0.5,
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + 2.5))
both_normal = "Male normal/\nFemale normal")) + ylim(0, 1.25) + #coord_cartesian(xlim = c(0.5, 2.5)) + +
both_normal scale_color_manual(values = c("#88CCEE", "#CC6677")) + coord_flip() + theme_bw() +
guides(colour = "none") + theme(legend.position = c(1, 0), legend.justification = c(1,
0)) + theme(legend.title = element_text(size = 9)) + theme(legend.direction = "horizontal") +
theme(legend.background = element_blank()) + theme(axis.text.y = element_text(size = 10,
colour = "black", hjust = 0.5, angle = 90))
d4
<- orchard_plot(m_mod_long, xlab = "absolute log response ratio (lnRR)", group = "Study",
d5 data = m_dat_log, cb = F, angle = 90) + scale_fill_manual(values = "#332288") +
scale_colour_manual(values = "#332288") + scale_x_discrete(labels = "Male sterlized/Female normal vs. \nMale normal/Female normal") +
ylim(-0.9, 0.5)
d5
Figure 4
<- d0 + d1 + plot_layout()
patch
+ plot_annotation(tag_levels = "A") patch
Figure S1
Related figures
<- (d2/d4) | (d3/d5) + plot_layout()
patch2
+ plot_annotation(tag_levels = "A") patch2
Contrasting sexes: all-combination data
Comparing M/F vs. M\(\star\)/F\(\star\)
# naming factor
$Comp_type <- factor(sdat_long$Comp_type, levels = c("both_castrated", "both_normal"),
sdat_longlabels = c("Male sterlized/\nFemale sterlized", "Male normal/\nFemale normal"))
# VCV matrix
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = sdat_long$vi, cluster = sdat_long$Shared_control,
V_matrix_long r = 0.5)
# correlaiton matrix for phylogeny tree <-
# read.tree(here('data/tree_rotl.tre')) tree <- compute.brlen(tree) cor_tree <-
# vcv(tree, corr = TRUE)
# without heteroscedasticity
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type - 1, random = list(~1 |
mod_comp2 ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID, ~1 | Obs), data = sdat_long, test = "t")
Species_Latin, summary(mod_comp2)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 64; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 24.7648 -49.5296 -37.5296 -24.7668 -36.0023
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0125 0.1118 10 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 25 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0033 0.0571 32 no Effect_ID
## sigma^2.4 0.0154 0.1242 64 no Obs
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 62) = 2017.0006, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 62) = 0.1994, p-val = 0.8197
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df
## Comp_typeMale sterlized/\nFemale sterlized -0.0104 0.0482 -0.2156 62
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal -0.0264 0.0482 -0.5470 62
## pval ci.lb ci.ub
## Comp_typeMale sterlized/\nFemale sterlized 0.8300 -0.1067 0.0860
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal 0.5863 -0.1227 0.0700
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# without heteroscedasticity
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type, random = list(~1 |
mod_comp2b ~1 | Study, ~1 | Effect_ID, ~1 | Obs), data = sdat_long, test = "t")
Species_Latin, summary(mod_comp2b)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 64; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 24.7648 -49.5296 -37.5296 -24.7668 -36.0023
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0125 0.1118 10 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 25 no Study
## sigma^2.3 0.0033 0.0571 32 no Effect_ID
## sigma^2.4 0.0154 0.1242 64 no Obs
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 62) = 2017.0006, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 62) = 0.2342, p-val = 0.6301
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt -0.0104 0.0482 -0.2156 62 0.8300
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal -0.0160 0.0330 -0.4839 62 0.6301
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt -0.1067 0.0860
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal -0.0820 0.0500
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_comp2b)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.002076156 0.506405183
# with heteroscedasticity
<- rma.mv(yi, V = V_matrix_long, mod = ~Comp_type, random = list(~1 |
mod_comp2c ~1 | Study, ~Comp_type | Effect_ID), rho = 0, struct = "HCS",
Species_Latin, data = sdat_long, test = "t")
summary(mod_comp2c)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 64; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 30.3689 -60.7377 -48.7377 -35.9749 -47.2105
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0057 0.0756 10 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 25 no Study
##
## outer factor: Effect_ID (nlvls = 32)
## inner factor: Comp_type (nlvls = 2)
##
## estim sqrt k.lvl fixed level
## tau^2.1 0.0058 0.0763 32 no Male sterlized/\nFemale sterlized
## tau^2.2 0.0343 0.1851 32 no Male normal/\nFemale normal
## rho 0.0000 yes
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 62) = 2017.0006, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 62) = 0.1620, p-val = 0.6887
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt -0.0231 0.0330 -0.7005 62 0.4862
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal -0.0150 0.0374 -0.4025 62 0.6887
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt -0.0889 0.0428
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal -0.0897 0.0596
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# Comparing models with and without heteroscedasticity
AIC(mod_comp2, mod_comp2c)
## df AIC
## mod_comp2 6 -37.52956
## mod_comp2c 6 -48.73773
# visualizing results
<- orchard_plot(mod_comp2c, mod = "Comp_type", xlab = "log response ratio (lnRR)",
f1 group = "Study", data = sdat_long, angle = 90) + scale_fill_manual(values = c("#D55E00",
"#009E73")) + scale_colour_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73"))
f1
Absolute effect size comparaion (M/F vs. M\(\star\)/F\(\star\))
# VCV matrix
<- impute_covariance_matrix(vi = sdat_long$abs_vi, cluster = sdat_long$Shared_control, r = 0.5)
abs_V_matrix_long
# with heteroscedasticity
<- rma.mv(abs_yi, V = abs_V_matrix_long,
mod_comp3 mod = ~ Comp_type - 1,
random = list( ~1|Species_Latin, ~1|Study, ~Comp_type|Effect_ID),
rho = 0, struct = "HCS",
data = sdat_long, test = "t")
summary(mod_comp3)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 64; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 46.7119 -93.4239 -81.4239 -68.6611 -79.8966
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0008 0.0283 10 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 25 no Study
##
## outer factor: Effect_ID (nlvls = 32)
## inner factor: Comp_type (nlvls = 2)
##
## estim sqrt k.lvl fixed level
## tau^2.1 0.0029 0.0540 32 no Male sterlized/\nFemale sterlized
## tau^2.2 0.0256 0.1600 32 no Male normal/\nFemale normal
## rho 0.0000 yes
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 62) = 1423.9437, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
## F(df1 = 2, df2 = 62) = 18.2633, p-val < .0001
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df
## Comp_typeMale sterlized/\nFemale sterlized 0.0844 0.0170 4.9548 62
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal 0.1547 0.0322 4.8113 62
## pval ci.lb ci.ub
## Comp_typeMale sterlized/\nFemale sterlized <.0001 0.0503 0.1184 ***
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal <.0001 0.0904 0.2190 ***
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
# with heteroscedasticity
<- rma.mv(abs_yi, V = abs_V_matrix_long,
mod_comp3b mod = ~ Comp_type,
random = list( ~1|Species_Latin, ~1|Study, ~Comp_type|Effect_ID),
rho = 0, struct = "HCS",
data = sdat_long, test = "t")
summary(mod_comp3b)
##
## Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 64; method: REML)
##
## logLik Deviance AIC BIC AICc
## 46.7119 -93.4239 -81.4239 -68.6611 -79.8966
##
## Variance Components:
##
## estim sqrt nlvls fixed factor
## sigma^2.1 0.0008 0.0283 10 no Species_Latin
## sigma^2.2 0.0000 0.0000 25 no Study
##
## outer factor: Effect_ID (nlvls = 32)
## inner factor: Comp_type (nlvls = 2)
##
## estim sqrt k.lvl fixed level
## tau^2.1 0.0029 0.0540 32 no Male sterlized/\nFemale sterlized
## tau^2.2 0.0256 0.1600 32 no Male normal/\nFemale normal
## rho 0.0000 yes
##
## Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
## QE(df = 62) = 1423.9437, p-val < .0001
##
## Test of Moderators (coefficient 2):
## F(df1 = 1, df2 = 62) = 5.0020, p-val = 0.0289
##
## Model Results:
##
## estimate se tval df pval
## intrcpt 0.0844 0.0170 4.9548 62 <.0001
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal 0.0703 0.0314 2.2365 62 0.0289
## ci.lb ci.ub
## intrcpt 0.0503 0.1184 ***
## Comp_typeMale normal/\nFemale normal 0.0075 0.1332 *
##
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
r2_ml(mod_comp3b)
## R2_marginal R2_conditional
## 0.6108544 1.0000000
# without heteroscedasticity
<- rma.mv(abs_yi, V = abs_V_matrix_long,
mod_comp3c mod = ~ Comp_type,
random = list( ~1|Species_Latin, ~1|Study, ~1|Effect_ID),
#rho = 0, struct = "HCS",
data = sdat_long, test = "t")
# Comparing models with and without heteroscedasticity
AIC(mod_comp3, mod_comp3c)
## df AIC
## mod_comp3 6 -81.42389
## mod_comp3c 5 491.98996
# visualizing results
<- orchard_plot(mod_comp3b, mod = "Comp_type", xlab = "absolute log response ratio (lnRR)",
f2 group = "Study", data = sdat_long, angle = 90) + scale_fill_manual(values = c("#D55E00",
"#009E73")) + scale_colour_manual(values = c("#D55E00", "#009E73"))
f2
Figure 5
<- f1/f2 + plot_layout()
patch3
+ plot_annotation(tag_levels = "A") patch3
Software and package versions
sessionInfo() %>%
pander()
R version 4.2.0 (2022-04-22)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin17.0 (64-bit)
locale: en_AU.UTF-8||en_AU.UTF-8||en_AU.UTF-8||C||en_AU.UTF-8||en_AU.UTF-8
attached base packages: grid, stats, graphics, grDevices, utils, datasets, methods and base
other attached packages: emmeans(v.1.7.3), groundhog(v.1.5.0), ggalluvial(v.0.12.3), GoodmanKruskal(v.0.0.3), naniar(v.0.6.1), formatR(v.1.12), here(v.1.0.1), png(v.0.1-7), MuMIn(v.1.46.0), clubSandwich(v.0.5.6), orchaRd(v.2.0), rotl(v.3.0.12), readxl(v.1.4.0), lme4(v.1.1-29), patchwork(v.1.1.1), kableExtra(v.1.3.4), ape(v.5.6-2), pander(v.0.6.5), metafor(v.3.4-0), metadat(v.1.2-0), Matrix(v.1.4-1), forcats(v.0.5.1), stringr(v.1.4.0), dplyr(v.1.0.9), purrr(v.0.3.4), readr(v.2.1.2), tidyr(v.1.2.0), tibble(v.3.1.8), ggplot2(v.3.3.6) and tidyverse(v.1.3.2)
loaded via a namespace (and not attached): ggbeeswarm(v.0.6.0), googledrive(v.2.0.0), minqa(v.1.2.4), colorspace(v.2.0-3), ellipsis(v.0.3.2), visdat(v.0.5.3), rprojroot(v.2.0.3), estimability(v.1.3), fs(v.1.5.2), rstudioapi(v.0.13), farver(v.2.1.1), bit64(v.4.0.5), mvtnorm(v.1.1-3), fansi(v.1.0.3), lubridate(v.1.8.0), mathjaxr(v.1.6-0), xml2(v.1.3.3), codetools(v.0.2-18), splines(v.4.2.0), cachem(v.1.0.6), knitr(v.1.39), jsonlite(v.1.8.0), nloptr(v.2.0.3), broom(v.1.0.0), dbplyr(v.2.2.1), latex2exp(v.0.9.4), rentrez(v.1.2.3), compiler(v.4.2.0), httr(v.1.4.3), backports(v.1.4.1), assertthat(v.0.2.1), fastmap(v.1.1.0), gargle(v.1.2.0), cli(v.3.3.0), htmltools(v.0.5.3), prettyunits(v.1.1.1), tools(v.4.2.0), coda(v.0.19-4), gtable(v.0.3.0), glue(v.1.6.2), Rcpp(v.1.0.8.3), cellranger(v.1.1.0), jquerylib(v.0.1.4), vctrs(v.0.4.1), svglite(v.2.1.0), nlme(v.3.1-157), xfun(v.0.31), rvest(v.1.0.2), lifecycle(v.1.0.1), pacman(v.0.5.1), XML(v.3.99-0.10), googlesheets4(v.1.0.0), MASS(v.7.3-56), zoo(v.1.8-10), scales(v.1.2.0), vroom(v.1.5.7), hms(v.1.1.1), parallel(v.4.2.0), sandwich(v.3.0-1), RColorBrewer(v.1.1-3), yaml(v.2.3.5), sass(v.0.4.2), stringi(v.1.7.8), highr(v.0.9), corrplot(v.0.92), boot(v.1.3-28), rlang(v.1.0.4), pkgconfig(v.2.0.3), systemfonts(v.1.0.4), rncl(v.0.8.6), evaluate(v.0.15), lattice(v.0.20-45), labeling(v.0.4.2), bit(v.4.0.4), tidyselect(v.1.1.2), magrittr(v.2.0.3), bookdown(v.0.26), R6(v.2.5.1), generics(v.0.1.3), DBI(v.1.1.3), mgcv(v.1.8-40), pillar(v.1.8.0), haven(v.2.5.0), withr(v.2.5.0), modelr(v.0.1.8), crayon(v.1.5.1), utf8(v.1.2.2), tzdb(v.0.3.0), rmarkdown(v.2.14), progress(v.1.2.2), rmdformats(v.1.0.4), reprex(v.2.0.1), digest(v.0.6.29), webshot(v.0.5.3), xtable(v.1.8-4), numDeriv(v.2016.8-1.1), stats4(v.4.2.0), munsell(v.0.5.0), beeswarm(v.0.4.0), viridisLite(v.0.4.0), vipor(v.0.4.5) and bslib(v.0.4.0)